Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.2%Lipscomb

71.8%Queens University

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.4

PROJECTED TOTAL163.5

MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -255

Queens University

21-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 79

Projected Total163.5

Projected ScoreQueens University 84

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricQueens University

47.9MMH Power Index51.7

111.3Offensive Efficiency118.4

107.6Defensive Efficiency117.0

3.7Net Efficiency1.4

-2.5Strength of Schedule0.1

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5

68.8Tempo71.4

54.8%Effective FG%56.6%

16.0%Turnover Rate14.8%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

26.5%Free Throw Rate37.6%

2.5Average Margin0.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–111.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.5), recent form (1.5–-1.0).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–117.0), net efficiency (3.7–1.4), average scoring margin (2.5–0.9).

Final

Lipscomb

94—81

Queens University

Lipscomb by 13 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATQueens University

32-59FG28-53

54.0%FG%53.0%

14-303PT8-17

47.0%3PT%47.0%

16-17FT17-25

94.0%FT%68.0%

29Rebounds24

3Offensive Rebounds3

15Assists11

7Turnovers7

4Steals4

1Blocks3

19Fouls18

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Gyasi Powell	Guard	36	7-17	4-10	5-6	6	0	0	0	23
Joe Anderson	Guard	33	8-11	3-5	2-2	5	3	1	0	21
Will Pruitt	Guard	38	6-10	1-3	6-6	3	4	2	0	19
Jacob Ognacevic	F	39	7-11	3-4	1-1	10	2	0	0	18
Charlie Williams	C	25	3-5	2-3	2-2	1	4	0	1	10
Miles White	G	13	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Kellan Boylan	F	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Logan Suber	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Rylan Houck	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Leo Colimerio	Forward	36	10-15	3-3	3-5	1	4	1	0	26
Kalib Mathews	Guard	32	4-9	1-4	5-7	1	3	1	1	14
Chris Ashby	G	26	5-9	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Bryce Cash	Guard	25	4-6	0-0	3-4	4	1	1	0	11
Yoav Berman	G	24	1-5	1-4	5-8	2	0	0	0	8
Maban Jabriel	F	22	2-4	1-3	1-1	7	0	1	0	6
Nasir Mann	G	18	2-5	1-1	0-0	4	2	0	0	5
Malcolm Wilson	Forward	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	2	0
Jordon Nevill	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Asjon Anderson	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0

134.3Offensive Efficiency115.7

115.7Defensive Efficiency134.3

18.6Net Efficiency-18.6

66.1%Effective FG%60.4%

70.1%True Shooting %62.4%

9.8%Turnover Rate10.2%

28.8%Free Throw Rate47.2%

50.8%3-Point Rate32.1%

2.14Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.