Texas

21-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.0%Texas

79.0%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -9.7

PROJECTED TOTAL164.2

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -376

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas 77

Projected Total164.2

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 87

Team Comparison

TexasMetricVanderbilt

61.6MMH Power Index68.9

119.6Offensive Efficiency120.9

110.1Defensive Efficiency105.7

9.5Net Efficiency15.2

5.3Strength of Schedule7.4

-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

69.2Tempo70.9

55.1%Effective FG%55.3%

15.5%Turnover Rate13.5%

35.9%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

44.3%Free Throw Rate39.3%

6.6Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–61.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–119.6), defensive efficiency (105.7–110.1), net efficiency (15.2–9.5).

Texas COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.9–30.8), free throw rate (44.3–39.3).

Final

Texas

78—86

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 8 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TexasTEAM STATVanderbilt

25-60FG30-71

42.0%FG%42.0%

9-253PT9-27

36.0%3PT%33.0%

19-27FT17-22

70.0%FT%77.0%

40Rebounds44

13Offensive Rebounds17

12Assists11

9Turnovers7

1Steals7

6Blocks1

21Fouls20

Player Box Score

Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tre Johnson	Guard	38	5-14	3-6	2-3	5	5	0	0	15
Arthur Kaluma	Forward	35	3-11	0-3	6-9	7	4	0	1	12
Kadin Shedrick	Forward	22	3-7	1-1	5-6	6	0	0	4	12
Julian Larry	Guard	32	4-8	1-2	2-2	5	1	1	0	11
Jordan Pope	G	26	3-10	3-9	2-2	7	0	0	0	11
Devon Pryor	F	24	4-6	0-2	1-1	2	1	0	0	9
Jayson Kent	Forward	13	3-4	1-2	1-4	5	0	0	0	8
Ze'Rik Onyema	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	1	0
Nic Codie	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylen Carey	F	28	8-13	0-0	2-4	14	0	1	1	18
Tyler Nickel	F	28	5-9	4-7	3-5	4	0	0	0	17
Jason Edwards	G	24	6-12	2-5	3-3	0	0	0	0	17
AJ Hoggard	Guard	29	4-15	1-4	5-5	2	6	0	0	14
MJ Collins Jr.	G	22	2-8	1-4	2-2	6	1	3	0	7
Devin McGlockton	F	24	2-6	1-5	1-1	8	0	1	0	6
Chris Manon	Guard	10	3-5	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	6
Grant Huffman	Guard	14	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	1
Tyler Tanner	G	21	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	3	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2

111.1Offensive Efficiency122.5

122.5Defensive Efficiency111.1

-11.4Net Efficiency11.4

49.2%Effective FG%48.6%

53.6%True Shooting %52.8%

13.1%Turnover Rate9.8%

45.0%Free Throw Rate31.0%

41.7%3-Point Rate38.0%

1.33Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.