
Canisius
10-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.2%Canisius
93.8%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -17.4
PROJECTED TOTAL132.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -1513

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCanisius 57
Projected Total132.3
Projected ScoreMerrimack 75
Team Comparison
33.9MMH Power Index53.7
97.1Offensive Efficiency106.4
108.8Defensive Efficiency103.2
-11.7Net Efficiency3.2
-1.8Strength of Schedule0.7
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
64.8Tempo64.4
46.8%Effective FG%49.3%
19.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
29.1%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
32.4%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-7.5Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–33.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–97.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–108.8), net efficiency (3.2–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (29.1–24.7).