
Penn State
12-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.7%Penn State
94.3%UCLA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCLA -18.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUCLA -1654

UCLA
24-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePenn State 67
Projected Total152.8
Projected ScoreUCLA 86
Team Comparison
42.3MMH Power Index63
109.2Offensive Efficiency115.9
117.6Defensive Efficiency106.9
-8.4Net Efficiency9.0
5.3Strength of Schedule5.1
-20.8Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
67.5Tempo66.5
53.4%Effective FG%53.5%
15.6%Turnover Rate13.4%
25.6%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
34.6%Free Throw Rate33.8%
-5.7Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UCLA HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUCLA holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.0–42.3), offensive efficiency (115.9–109.2), defensive efficiency (106.9–117.6), net efficiency (9.0–-8.4).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–5.1), free throw rate (34.6–33.8).