Vermont logo

Vermont

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
67.7%Vermont
32.3%UAlbany
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVermont -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL140.3
MODEL MONEYLINEVermont -210
UAlbany logo

UAlbany

11-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVermont 72
Projected Total140.3
Projected ScoreUAlbany 68

Team Comparison

53.1MMH Power Index41.9
112.2Offensive Efficiency107.9
104.7Defensive Efficiency108.8
7.5Net Efficiency-0.9
-4.4Strength of Schedule-6.1
12.4Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0
65.4Tempo64.3
54.1%Effective FG%52.8%
14.4%Turnover Rate18.6%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
32.4%Free Throw Rate25.0%
4.9Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Vermont HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVermont holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.1–41.9), offensive efficiency (112.2–107.9), defensive efficiency (104.7–108.8), net efficiency (7.5–-0.9).
UAlbany COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (34.3–26.8).
Final
Vermont logo
Vermont
68—62
UAlbany logo
UAlbany
Vermont by 6 • 59.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VermontTEAM STATUAlbany
24-59FG24-56
41.0%FG%43.0%
7-213PT8-28
33.0%3PT%29.0%
13-15FT6-8
87.0%FT%75.0%
38Rebounds27
14Offensive Rebounds7
8Assists12
9Turnovers5
5Steals5
—Blocks2
8Fouls14

Player Box Score

Vermont
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ HurleyG346-102-47-822000021
Nick FiorilloForward346-144-71-152200017
Shamir BoguesGuard367-131-20-051100015
Ileri Ayo-FaleyeForward312-100-55-510110009
Sam AlamutuG342-70-10-18210004
Noah BarnettF41-10-00-01000002
Seth JobaF110-20-10-02000000
Sean BlakeG100-10-00-01000000
Jace RoquemoreGuard60-10-10-00000000
UAlbany
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amar'e MarshallG328-132-52-231010020
Kacper KlaczekF334-103-81-244010012
Justin NeelyF254-80-11-26310009
Kheni BriggsG233-62-40-02010008
DeMarr Langford Jr.Not Available363-50-00-05110006
Byron JoshuaGuard401-100-62-24220004
Amir LindseyG71-31-30-01100003
Zacharie MatuluG40-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

59.5Possessions59.5
114.3Offensive Efficiency104.2
104.2Defensive Efficiency114.3
10.1Net Efficiency-10.1
46.6%Effective FG%50.0%
51.4%True Shooting %51.8%
14.7%Turnover Rate8.7%
25.4%Free Throw Rate14.3%
35.6%3-Point Rate50.0%
0.89Assist / Turnover2.40
Game Summary
Vermont won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 59.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.