Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.2%Grambling

64.8%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -4.0

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -184

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 69

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 73

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricAlabama A&M

41.4MMH Power Index42.3

100.7Offensive Efficiency105.9

100.4Defensive Efficiency106.6

0.3Net Efficiency-0.7

-5.7Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

69.9Tempo68.0

49.2%Effective FG%49.7%

20.9%Turnover Rate16.8%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

42.2%Free Throw Rate45.7%

0.2Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.7), recent form (3.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.6), net efficiency (0.3–-0.7), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.8).

Final

Grambling

72—61

Alabama A&M

Grambling by 11 • 68.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATAlabama A&M

22-43FG19-57

51.0%FG%33.0%

7-173PT8-28

41.0%3PT%29.0%

21-33FT15-25

64.0%FT%60.0%

37Rebounds31

6Offensive Rebounds13

14Assists12

16Turnovers13

4Steals8

1Blocks1

18Fouls24

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	35	5-12	4-9	3-4	2	3	2	0	17
Antwan Burnett	G	32	5-10	0-2	5-9	9	2	0	0	15
PJ Eason	F	24	4-5	0-0	7-10	5	0	1	1	15
Mikale Stevenson	G	34	3-6	2-2	5-8	6	7	1	0	13
James Flippin	F	10	3-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Cbo Newton	G	16	1-1	1-1	1-2	1	1	0	0	4
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Lou Hutchinson	G	12	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Emareyon McDonald	Guard	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Ernest Ross	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
P.J. Edwards	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Dupree Fletcher	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	28	5-11	3-7	2-2	9	2	1	0	15
Angok Anyang	F	22	6-8	0-0	1-1	4	2	2	0	13
Darius Ford	Guard	15	3-4	2-3	5-8	0	1	0	0	13
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	27	2-7	1-4	5-6	4	2	2	0	10
AC Bryant	G	27	2-10	1-4	1-4	2	1	1	0	6
Saliou Seye	F	14	1-2	1-1	1-4	2	0	0	0	4
Quincy McGriff	Guard	18	0-3	0-2	0-0	4	2	0	0	0
London Riley	Guard	13	0-5	0-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Warren Yeh	Guard	12	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Jaylen Colon	Guard	11	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Clance Crosby	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Aaron Smith	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Austin Harvell	Forward	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Joshua Hughley	Guard	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.8Possessions68.8

104.7Offensive Efficiency88.7

88.7Defensive Efficiency104.7

16.0Net Efficiency-16.0

59.3%Effective FG%40.4%

61.4%True Shooting %44.3%

23.3%Turnover Rate18.9%

76.7%Free Throw Rate43.9%

39.5%3-Point Rate49.1%

0.88Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Grambling won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 68.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.