UAB logo

UAB

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
71.0%UAB
29.0%East Carolina
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL153.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -245
East Carolina logo

East Carolina

11-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 80
Projected Total153.2
Projected ScoreEast Carolina 74

Team Comparison

56.9MMH Power Index44.3
110.5Offensive Efficiency102.0
102.9Defensive Efficiency110.5
7.6Net Efficiency-8.5
0.4Strength of Schedule2.6
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.8
71.7Tempo70.1
48.8%Effective FG%46.7%
12.4%Turnover Rate17.4%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.9%
36.9%Free Throw Rate40.2%
5.4Average Margin-5.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–102.0), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.5), net efficiency (7.6–-8.5).
East Carolina COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.6–0.4), offensive rebounding (33.9–32.7), free throw rate (40.2–36.9).
Final
UAB logo
UAB
75—82
East Carolina logo
East Carolina
East Carolina by 7 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATEast Carolina
25-62FG30-60
40.0%FG%50.0%
8-193PT8-20
42.0%3PT%40.0%
17-20FT14-19
85.0%FT%74.0%
34Rebounds30
15Offensive Rebounds10
15Assists16
10Turnovers8
7Steals6
3Blocks3
17Fouls14

Player Box Score

UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF388-120-06-8113230022
Tyren MooreG256-124-70-012100016
Christian ColemanG265-140-02-2122100012
Alejandro VasquezGuard242-52-44-412000010
Butta JohnsonG302-71-52-23100007
Bradley EzewiroForward151-70-03-44000005
Tony ToneyGuard271-21-20-02320003
Ja'Borri McGheeG150-30-10-00210000
East Carolina
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
C.J. WalkerForward3710-160-09-1162010029
RJ FeltonGuard399-185-110-062000023
Jordan RileyG334-90-24-665200012
Cam HayesGuard344-82-30-013000010
Reid CasonF42-20-00-00010004
Yann FarellF211-71-40-02020003
Trevion LaBeauxG220-00-01-27212001
Jayshayne WoodardG100-00-00-02200000

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8
112.3Offensive Efficiency122.8
122.8Defensive Efficiency112.3
-10.5Net Efficiency10.5
46.8%Effective FG%56.7%
52.4%True Shooting %59.4%
15.0%Turnover Rate11.9%
32.3%Free Throw Rate31.7%
30.6%3-Point Rate33.3%
1.50Assist / Turnover2.00
Game Summary
East Carolina won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.