Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.6%Pittsburgh
86.4%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL154.4
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -635
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePittsburgh 71
Projected Total154.4
Projected ScoreSMU 84

Team Comparison

50.5MMH Power Index62.5
108.4Offensive Efficiency118.2
110.4Defensive Efficiency109.6
-2.0Net Efficiency8.6
5.5Strength of Schedule7.0
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
65.0Tempo71.1
51.4%Effective FG%55.7%
17.3%Turnover Rate15.7%
33.1%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
31.2%Free Throw Rate31.3%
-1.3Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–50.5), offensive efficiency (118.2–108.4), defensive efficiency (109.6–110.4), net efficiency (8.6–-2.0).
Final
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
63—83
SMU logo
SMU
SMU by 20 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATSMU
21-66FG29-52
32.0%FG%56.0%
9-353PT10-20
26.0%3PT%50.0%
12-15FT15-23
80.0%FT%65.0%
35Rebounds40
17Offensive Rebounds11
16Assists18
12Turnovers15
9Steals9
4Blocks3
20Fouls18

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Guillermo Diaz GrahamF325-93-62-382100015
Brandin CummingsG163-82-54-413200012
Ishmael LeggettGuard385-170-80-062210010
Jaland LoweG263-92-51-22510009
Zack AustinForward402-102-82-26213008
Cameron CorhenF203-70-00-04220006
Amsal DelalicG90-20-12-22000002
Jorge Diaz GrahamF110-30-21-22000001
Papa Amadou KanteF80-10-00-01000000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kario OquendoGuard285-84-63-440000017
Samet YigitogluC277-110-03-5103110017
Boopie MillerG314-62-33-464300013
Matt CrossForward284-72-33-652100013
B.J. EdwardsG293-60-22-27622008
Keon Ambrose-HyltonForward133-60-01-23000007
Chuck HarrisGuard292-62-50-01320006
AJ GeorgeG21-10-00-00000002
Jerrell ColbertF100-00-00-01000000
Tibet GorenerForward30-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5
93.3Offensive Efficiency123.0
123.0Defensive Efficiency93.3
-29.6Net Efficiency29.6
38.6%Effective FG%65.4%
43.1%True Shooting %66.0%
17.6%Turnover Rate22.4%
22.7%Free Throw Rate44.2%
53.0%3-Point Rate38.5%
1.33Assist / Turnover1.20
Game Summary
SMU won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.