
Dayton
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.7%Dayton
36.3%Fordham
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -1.3
PROJECTED TOTAL138.7
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -175

Fordham
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDayton 70
Projected Total138.7
Projected ScoreFordham 69
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index50.3
108.5Offensive Efficiency105.9
101.5Defensive Efficiency99.3
7.0Net Efficiency6.6
5.7Strength of Schedule-2.4
6.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.9
68.3Tempo65.9
52.0%Effective FG%50.0%
16.9%Turnover Rate17.3%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %34.5%
47.6%Free Throw Rate26.9%
4.8Average Margin4.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.3), offensive efficiency (108.5–105.9), net efficiency (7.0–6.6), strength of schedule (5.7–-2.4).
Fordham COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.3–101.5), offensive rebounding (34.5–26.7).