Army

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.8%Army

72.2%Loyola Maryland

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLoyola Maryland -7.0

PROJECTED TOTAL153.1

MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Maryland -260

Loyola Maryland

12-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArmy 73

Projected Total153.1

Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 80

Team Comparison

ArmyMetricLoyola Maryland

36.8MMH Power Index40.8

104.8Offensive Efficiency108.1

112.1Defensive Efficiency110.7

-7.3Net Efficiency-2.6

-3.3Strength of Schedule-5.0

-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1

68.9Tempo69.6

49.8%Effective FG%51.2%

17.3%Turnover Rate15.7%

31.0%Offensive Rebound %29.4%

26.5%Free Throw Rate31.0%

-5.1Average Margin-1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Loyola Maryland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Maryland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (40.8–36.8), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.8), defensive efficiency (110.7–112.1), net efficiency (-2.6–-7.3).

Army COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.3–-5.0), offensive rebounding (31.0–29.4).

Final

Army

64—60

Loyola Maryland

Army by 4 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATLoyola Maryland

24-55FG22-63

44.0%FG%35.0%

3-223PT7-32

14.0%3PT%22.0%

13-17FT9-17

76.0%FT%53.0%

33Rebounds44

5Offensive Rebounds16

9Assists13

8Turnovers12

7Steals7

5Blocks2

14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josh Scovens	G	37	9-12	1-2	3-6	4	2	1	3	22
Jalen Rucker	Guard	33	7-16	0-6	5-5	5	1	1	0	19
AJ Allenspach	Forward	24	2-4	0-0	5-6	2	0	1	1	9
Jorn Everson	F	13	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Isaiah Caldwell	Guard	32	2-7	0-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	4
Blake Barker	Guard	7	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Kendall Hailey	Guard	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Ryan Curry	G	36	0-6	0-5	0-0	8	4	2	0	0
Tate Laczkowski	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Jacen Holloway	F	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Kevin McCarthy	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Loyola Maryland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Milos Ilic	C	32	8-14	1-3	3-5	8	2	1	0	20
Jordan Stiemke	G	37	5-15	3-11	0-0	6	2	2	2	13
Veljko Ilic	F	22	4-7	0-0	3-4	6	2	0	0	11
David Brown III	Guard	18	3-5	3-4	0-0	3	2	0	0	9
Braeden Speed	G	33	1-7	0-4	3-6	7	1	0	0	5
Jacob Theodosiou	G	32	1-12	0-8	0-2	4	3	2	0	2
Tyson Commander	G	22	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	1	1	0	0
Samuel Gibbs	Guard	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

96.1Offensive Efficiency90.1

90.1Defensive Efficiency96.1

6.0Net Efficiency-6.0

46.4%Effective FG%40.5%

50.7%True Shooting %42.2%

12.1%Turnover Rate17.9%

30.9%Free Throw Rate27.0%

40.0%3-Point Rate50.8%

1.13Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Army won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.