Chattanooga

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.4%Chattanooga

80.6%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -9.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -415

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 73

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreSamford 83

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricSamford

45.9MMH Power Index54.1

112.7Offensive Efficiency113.5

110.5Defensive Efficiency108.3

2.2Net Efficiency5.2

-4.4Strength of Schedule-2.9

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

68.1Tempo69.5

55.1%Effective FG%54.0%

14.1%Turnover Rate13.3%

23.5%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

29.2%Free Throw Rate42.5%

1.4Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–45.9), offensive efficiency (113.5–112.7), defensive efficiency (108.3–110.5), net efficiency (5.2–2.2).

Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (55.1–54.0).

Final

Chattanooga

82—68

Samford

Chattanooga by 14 • 69.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATSamford

29-53FG23-60

55.0%FG%38.0%

8-213PT5-25

38.0%3PT%20.0%

16-22FT17-24

73.0%FT%71.0%

30Rebounds37

7Offensive Rebounds18

21Assists12

14Turnovers15

12Steals11

4Blocks3

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Bonham	Guard	27	6-12	2-4	4-4	4	3	3	0	18
Honor Huff	G	40	4-11	4-10	5-6	1	3	1	0	17
Frank Champion	Forward	34	6-6	0-0	2-4	9	8	3	3	14
Jack Kostel	Guard	20	4-8	1-4	2-2	1	0	1	0	11
Sean Cusano	G	13	3-3	1-1	1-2	2	0	1	0	8
Garrison Keeslar	Forward	32	2-5	0-2	2-4	3	4	1	1	6
Bash Wieland	Guard	27	3-6	0-0	0-0	7	3	2	0	6
Collin Mulholland	F	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Makai Richards	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Josh Holloway	G	26	5-11	0-3	8-10	3	4	1	0	18
Rylan Jones	Guard	32	5-11	3-7	1-2	3	3	1	0	14
Riley Allenspach	F	17	4-7	1-1	2-2	6	1	1	0	11
Jaden Brownell	F	18	3-11	0-4	2-2	4	1	1	0	8
Trey Fort	G	11	3-5	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Lukas Walls	G	29	1-3	1-3	2-4	5	2	4	0	5
Collin Holloway	Forward	21	1-4	0-2	2-4	5	0	1	0	4
Hamed Olayinka	F	17	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	3	2
Isaiah West	G	15	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Julian Brown	Guard	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zion Wilburn	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Brody Boyer	Guard	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Paulie Stramaglia	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.5Possessions69.5

118.0Offensive Efficiency97.8

97.8Defensive Efficiency118.0

20.1Net Efficiency-20.1

62.3%Effective FG%42.5%

64.6%True Shooting %47.6%

19.9%Turnover Rate21.9%

41.5%Free Throw Rate40.0%

39.6%3-Point Rate41.7%

1.50Assist / Turnover0.80

Game Summary

Chattanooga won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 69.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.