
Grand Canyon
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
76.6%Grand Canyon
23.4%Tarleton State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -6.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.2
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -327

Tarleton State
14-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 77
Projected Total147.2
Projected ScoreTarleton State 71
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index44.6
109.2Offensive Efficiency103.2
99.1Defensive Efficiency101.6
10.1Net Efficiency1.6
2.0Strength of Schedule-2.3
9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
69.3Tempo72.2
52.1%Effective FG%49.0%
17.6%Turnover Rate19.9%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
41.0%Free Throw Rate42.8%
7.0Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.2), defensive efficiency (99.1–101.6), net efficiency (10.1–1.6).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.8–31.2), free throw rate (42.8–41.0).