Stetson logo

Stetson

12-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.0%Stetson
80.0%Lipscomb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLipscomb -11.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.4
MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -400
Lipscomb logo

Lipscomb

18-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStetson 72
Projected Total154.4
Projected ScoreLipscomb 83

Team Comparison

40MMH Power Index47.9
107.2Offensive Efficiency111.3
115.9Defensive Efficiency107.6
-8.7Net Efficiency3.7
-1.0Strength of Schedule-2.5
-2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
68.7Tempo68.8
53.8%Effective FG%54.8%
18.3%Turnover Rate16.0%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %25.9%
33.6%Free Throw Rate26.5%
-6.0Average Margin2.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–40.0), offensive efficiency (111.3–107.2), defensive efficiency (107.6–115.9), net efficiency (3.7–-8.7).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.0–-2.5), offensive rebounding (28.1–25.9), free throw rate (33.6–26.5).
Final
Stetson logo
Stetson
60—93
Lipscomb logo
Lipscomb
Lipscomb by 33 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StetsonTEAM STATLipscomb
24-63FG35-64
38.0%FG%55.0%
5-233PT17-36
22.0%3PT%47.0%
7-9FT6-8
78.0%FT%75.0%
29Rebounds40
6Offensive Rebounds6
8Assists21
6Turnovers5
4Steals2
3Blocks2
9Fouls11

Player Box Score

Stetson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Treyton ThompsonForward196-71-22-250010015
Mehki EllisonG344-132-73-424000013
Jordan WoodForward273-41-20-03310007
Jamie Phillips Jr.G263-101-30-03100007
Blaize SagnaG183-50-10-02010006
Finley SheridanF122-50-02-21000006
Josh MasseyForward232-90-30-16022004
Abramo CankaGuard141-50-20-02000002
Tristan GrossG210-40-20-02000000
Landen BabusiakForward30-00-00-01000000
Alex DoyleF30-10-10-00000000
Lipscomb
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jacob OgnacevicF3512-161-35-780010030
Will PruittGuard298-144-70-060000020
Gyasi PowellGuard324-123-100-0102010011
Miles WhiteG213-62-50-03100008
Logan SuberG52-22-21-10200007
Charlie WilliamsC232-52-40-03600006
Ross CandelinoG32-22-20-00000006
Joe AndersonGuard312-61-30-03810005
Kellan BoylanF120-10-00-03110000
Rylan HouckForward30-00-00-00100000
Jack IngoldGuard30-00-00-00000000
Zach LameyG20-00-00-02000000
Luke CarterG10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1
89.4Offensive Efficiency138.6
138.6Defensive Efficiency89.4
-49.2Net Efficiency49.2
42.1%Effective FG%68.0%
44.6%True Shooting %68.6%
8.9%Turnover Rate7.5%
14.3%Free Throw Rate12.5%
36.5%3-Point Rate56.3%
1.33Assist / Turnover4.20
Game Summary
Lipscomb won by 33 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.