Rice

13-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.7%Rice

60.3%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulane -2.9

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINETulane -152

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRice 73

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreTulane 76

Team Comparison

RiceMetricTulane

45.1MMH Power Index44.3

108.3Offensive Efficiency105.3

109.2Defensive Efficiency109.9

-0.9Net Efficiency-4.6

-2.2Strength of Schedule2.7

-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

68.3Tempo68.7

49.7%Effective FG%49.6%

17.8%Turnover Rate15.6%

35.7%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

34.7%Free Throw Rate44.8%

-0.6Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–44.3), offensive efficiency (108.3–105.3), defensive efficiency (109.2–109.9), net efficiency (-0.9–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.2), ball security (15.6–17.8), free throw rate (44.8–34.7).

Final

Rice

78—81

Tulane

Tulane by 3 • 65.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiceTEAM STATTulane

25-58FG27-57

43.0%FG%47.0%

10-213PT9-21

48.0%3PT%43.0%

18-23FT18-25

78.0%FT%72.0%

35Rebounds36

11Offensive Rebounds10

15Assists17

8Turnovers6

4Steals5

6Blocks10

15Fouls21

Player Box Score

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Dar	G	36	6-8	6-7	3-4	3	0	2	4	21
Caden Powell	C	30	6-11	0-0	6-6	8	4	0	0	18
Kellen Amos	Guard	30	5-10	2-5	4-6	9	3	1	0	16
Trae Broadnax	G	26	4-10	1-1	4-4	4	3	1	1	13
Andrew Akuchie	F	26	2-8	0-0	1-3	5	1	0	1	5
Denver Anglin	G	24	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Aaron Powell	G	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	2
Emory Lanier	Guard	12	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Alem Huseinovic	Guard	8	0-5	0-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	38	7-11	4-6	7-7	6	8	1	0	25
Asher Woods	G	36	7-12	4-5	2-2	3	2	1	0	20
Gregg Glenn III	F	28	8-15	0-4	4-8	4	4	0	2	20
Kam Williams	G	35	3-7	1-4	1-2	5	0	1	3	8
Tyler Ringgold	F	18	2-4	0-0	0-0	6	1	0	1	4
Kaleb Banks	F	21	0-3	0-2	2-2	6	1	0	3	2
Percy Daniels	C	9	0-1	0-0	2-2	0	1	1	1	2
Mari Jordan	G	10	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Spencer Elliott	F	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
KJ Greene	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.4Possessions65.4

119.3Offensive Efficiency123.9

123.9Defensive Efficiency119.3

-4.6Net Efficiency4.6

51.7%Effective FG%55.3%

56.6%True Shooting %58.8%

12.1%Turnover Rate9.2%

39.7%Free Throw Rate43.9%

36.2%3-Point Rate36.8%

1.88Assist / Turnover2.83

Game Summary

Tulane won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 65.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.