UMass Lowell

15-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

64.2%UMass Lowell

35.8%New Hampshire

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUMass Lowell -2.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUMass Lowell -179

New Hampshire

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUMass Lowell 75

Projected Total148.8

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 73

Team Comparison

UMass LowellMetricNew Hampshire

43.8MMH Power Index34

107.9Offensive Efficiency99.6

109.9Defensive Efficiency107.5

-2.0Net Efficiency-7.9

-4.6Strength of Schedule-3.4

1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6

69.4Tempo69.4

51.0%Effective FG%47.6%

17.6%Turnover Rate16.1%

35.1%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

37.9%Free Throw Rate29.4%

-1.4Average Margin-5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UMass Lowell HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMass Lowell holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.8–34.0), offensive efficiency (107.9–99.6), net efficiency (-2.0–-7.9), recent form (1.0–-17.6).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.5–109.9), strength of schedule (-3.4–-4.6), ball security (16.1–17.6).

Final

UMass Lowell

79—80

New Hampshire

New Hampshire by 1 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UMass LowellTEAM STATNew Hampshire

31-54FG30-62

57.0%FG%48.0%

7-173PT14-33

41.0%3PT%42.0%

10-16FT6-11

63.0%FT%55.0%

35Rebounds26

11Offensive Rebounds10

17Assists16

18Turnovers12

5Steals10

3Blocks1

13Fouls18

Player Box Score

UMass Lowell

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Quinton Mincey	Guard	40	9-16	4-7	1-2	4	3	0	0	23
Max Brooks	Forward	28	10-12	0-0	0-3	1	0	1	0	20
Cam Morris III	F	29	5-8	1-1	4-6	6	1	4	2	15
Martin Somerville	G	39	3-8	2-6	4-4	2	8	0	1	12
Yuri Covington	Guard	36	2-5	0-2	1-1	9	0	0	0	5
Xzavier Lino	Forward	8	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Anthony Blunt	Guard	12	0-3	0-1	0-0	3	2	0	0	0
Caleb Murphy	Not Available	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	3	0	0	0

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sami Pissis	G	25	7-18	5-11	2-4	2	6	2	0	21
Anthony McComb III	G	25	7-13	0-3	2-2	4	2	0	0	16
Khalil Badru	G	28	5-8	2-3	1-3	4	0	2	0	13
Jawarie Hamelin	Guard	31	4-6	3-3	0-0	1	2	4	0	11
Davide Poser	F	28	3-6	3-6	0-0	2	2	0	1	9
Antoni Siewruk	G	11	2-5	1-4	0-0	1	0	1	0	5
Emmanuel Okpomo	Forward	22	1-2	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	0	3
Jon O'Neill	F	13	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2
Dylan Saunders	F	14	0-3	0-3	0-0	1	2	1	0	0
Caleb Middleton	C	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9

114.7Offensive Efficiency116.1

116.1Defensive Efficiency114.7

-1.5Net Efficiency1.5

63.9%Effective FG%59.7%

64.1%True Shooting %59.5%

26.2%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.6%Free Throw Rate17.7%

31.5%3-Point Rate53.2%

0.94Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

New Hampshire won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.