
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.0%Drexel
79.0%William & Mary
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -9.1
PROJECTED TOTAL149.4
MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -376

William & Mary
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 70
Projected Total149.4
Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 79
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index53.8
103.6Offensive Efficiency112.5
102.4Defensive Efficiency105.2
1.2Net Efficiency7.3
-0.4Strength of Schedule-1.5
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5
65.7Tempo73.9
51.3%Effective FG%55.3%
19.1%Turnover Rate16.4%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
32.3%Free Throw Rate45.3%
0.8Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
William & Mary HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (112.5–103.6), net efficiency (7.3–1.2), recent form (3.5–-4.7).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–105.2), strength of schedule (-0.4–-1.5), offensive rebounding (30.7–26.7).