
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
78.3%Hofstra
21.7%Hampton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -7.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.4
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -361

Hampton
13-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 74
Projected Total141.4
Projected ScoreHampton 67
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index43.2
114.0Offensive Efficiency104.3
100.9Defensive Efficiency105.6
13.1Net Efficiency-1.3
-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.7
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.1
66.2Tempo67.0
52.2%Effective FG%47.3%
16.1%Turnover Rate16.7%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.3%
32.0%Free Throw Rate39.3%
8.7Average Margin-0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–43.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–104.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.6), net efficiency (13.1–-1.3).
Hampton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.7–-2.9), free throw rate (39.3–32.0).