
Grand Canyon
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
65.2%Grand Canyon
34.8%UT Arlington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL140.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -187

UT Arlington
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 71
Projected Total140.1
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 69
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index49.6
109.2Offensive Efficiency102.7
99.1Defensive Efficiency97.9
10.1Net Efficiency4.8
2.0Strength of Schedule-0.8
9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9
69.3Tempo68.1
52.1%Effective FG%48.5%
17.6%Turnover Rate20.4%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
41.0%Free Throw Rate43.7%
7.0Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (109.2–102.7), net efficiency (10.1–4.8), strength of schedule (2.0–-0.8).
UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–99.1), offensive rebounding (36.0–31.2), free throw rate (43.7–41.0).