Mercyhurst

17-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.4%Mercyhurst

41.6%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -1.0

PROJECTED TOTAL134.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -140

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMercyhurst 68

Projected Total134.4

Projected ScoreStonehill 67

Team Comparison

MercyhurstMetricStonehill

45.5MMH Power Index37.9

105.2Offensive Efficiency97.5

102.2Defensive Efficiency100.7

3.0Net Efficiency-3.2

-5.7Strength of Schedule-5.4

3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

65.9Tempo68.1

50.5%Effective FG%48.0%

14.4%Turnover Rate19.1%

26.8%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

25.4%Free Throw Rate29.2%

2.0Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–37.9), offensive efficiency (105.2–97.5), net efficiency (3.0–-3.2), recent form (3.2–-3.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.2), strength of schedule (-5.4–-5.7), offensive rebounding (28.4–26.8).

Final

Mercyhurst

73—85

Stonehill

Stonehill by 12 • 62.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MercyhurstTEAM STATStonehill

23-53FG30-54

43.0%FG%56.0%

6-123PT8-22

50.0%3PT%36.0%

21-27FT17-20

78.0%FT%85.0%

21Rebounds36

8Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists15

6Turnovers8

3Steals3

—Blocks4

20Fouls20

Player Box Score

Mercyhurst

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Shemar Rathan-Mayes	Guard	28	6-15	3-5	4-5	2	4	1	19
Aidan Reichert	Forward	34	5-11	0-0	6-7	6	2	0	16
Jeff Planutis	Forward	32	5-11	0-2	1-1	3	1	1	11
Bernie Blunt III	G	27	2-6	0-0	5-5	1	0	0	9
Deshaun Jackson Jr.	G	18	2-3	2-2	1-2	2	1	0	7
Jake Lemelman	G	18	2-4	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	5
James Thomas	F	5	1-1	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	4
Mykolas Ivanauskas	F	10	0-0	0-0	2-4	1	0	0	2
Max Jusianiec	G	26	0-2	0-1	0-1	3	1	1	0
Sean Lang	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Louie Semona	F	40	10-16	5-9	5-6	5	0	0	0	30
Todd Brogna	F	35	5-8	0-0	6-6	10	4	0	2	16
Ethan Meuser	F	24	6-8	2-4	0-0	7	1	1	0	14
Chas Stinson	G	33	4-8	0-0	3-5	6	3	0	2	11
Hermann Koffi	G	35	3-9	1-7	0-0	3	3	0	0	7
Nathan McGill	Guard	15	1-2	0-1	1-1	2	1	0	0	3
Amir Nesbitt	Guard	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	3	2	0	2
Pearse McGuinn	F	4	0-1	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Alex Bates IV	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.7Possessions62.7

116.4Offensive Efficiency135.6

135.6Defensive Efficiency116.4

-19.1Net Efficiency19.1

49.1%Effective FG%63.0%

55.5%True Shooting %66.9%

9.4%Turnover Rate13.0%

50.9%Free Throw Rate37.0%

22.6%3-Point Rate40.7%

1.67Assist / Turnover1.88

Game Summary

Stonehill won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 62.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.