Houston Christian

12-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.9%Houston Christian

91.1%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -16.2

PROJECTED TOTAL142.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -1024

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHouston Christian 63

Projected Total142.4

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 79

Team Comparison

Houston ChristianMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

39.5MMH Power Index55.8

102.5Offensive Efficiency112.6

110.3Defensive Efficiency103.1

-7.8Net Efficiency9.5

-0.6Strength of Schedule-1.9

-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

65.4Tempo67.4

49.9%Effective FG%55.7%

19.0%Turnover Rate17.9%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

37.1%Free Throw Rate29.6%

-5.1Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–39.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.5), defensive efficiency (103.1–110.3), net efficiency (9.5–-7.8).

Houston Christian COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.6–-1.9), offensive rebounding (30.5–29.2), free throw rate (37.1–29.6).

Final

Houston Christian

52—76

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 24 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Houston ChristianTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

20-59FG33-65

34.0%FG%51.0%

8-333PT10-26

24.0%3PT%38.0%

4-10FTnull-1

40.0%FT%0.0%

38Rebounds38

15Offensive Rebounds10

13Assists21

16Turnovers11

6Steals12

7Blocks2

4Fouls11

Player Box Score

Houston Christian

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bryson Dawkins	G	30	6-15	3-9	0-0	2	0	1	0	15
Peyton Rogers	Forward	32	3-5	1-2	3-5	8	1	2	2	10
Porter Bazil	SF	19	3-7	3-7	1-2	3	2	1	2	10
Elijah Brooks	G	30	3-8	0-1	0-0	8	3	0	0	6
Trent Johnson	F	28	2-7	1-5	0-0	7	2	1	2	5
D'Aundre Samuels	G	33	1-9	0-6	0-2	4	4	0	1	2
Pierce Bazil	PG	19	1-5	0-3	0-1	2	1	0	0	2
Mason McBride	Guard	7	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Nathan Self	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cliff Davis	G	33	8-12	7-10	0-1	2	3	2	0	23
Trey Miller	G	34	10-14	0-1	0-0	4	6	3	2	20
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	29	5-11	1-2	0-0	5	3	3	0	11
DK Thorn	Guard	29	3-8	1-4	0-0	2	1	4	0	7
K.T. Raimey	Guard	15	3-7	1-5	0-0	3	2	0	0	7
Kwo Agwa	F	30	2-6	0-1	0-0	7	2	0	0	4
Jaylen Washington	G	20	1-4	0-2	0-0	3	3	0	0	2
Marshal Destremau	F	10	1-3	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

79.1Offensive Efficiency115.7

115.7Defensive Efficiency79.1

-36.5Net Efficiency36.5

40.7%Effective FG%58.5%

40.8%True Shooting %58.0%

24.7%Turnover Rate16.5%

16.9%Free Throw Rate1.5%

55.9%3-Point Rate40.0%

0.81Assist / Turnover1.91

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.