UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.3%UTSA

98.7%Tulsa

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulsa -29.6

PROJECTED TOTAL157.5

MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -7592

Tulsa

30-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 64

Projected Total157.5

Projected ScoreTulsa 94

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricTulsa

30.5MMH Power Index64.8

99.0Offensive Efficiency121.1

115.0Defensive Efficiency104.8

-16.0Net Efficiency16.3

-1.2Strength of Schedule0.0

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3

70.2Tempo70.2

45.9%Effective FG%55.4%

17.0%Turnover Rate15.4%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %33.8%

29.9%Free Throw Rate42.4%

-11.3Average Margin11.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–30.5), offensive efficiency (121.1–99.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–115.0), net efficiency (16.3–-16.0).

Final

UTSA

76—80

Tulsa

Tulsa by 4 • 72.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATTulsa

21-61FG25-47

34.0%FG%53.0%

10-313PT7-18

32.0%3PT%39.0%

24-31FT23-29

77.0%FT%79.0%

35Rebounds33

14Offensive Rebounds3

7Assists18

11Turnovers15

10Steals9

2Blocks3

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Raekwon Horton	Forward	37	5-9	0-2	10-12	5	0	2	0	20
Marcus Millender	G	37	7-21	4-11	1-1	4	3	4	0	19
Primo Spears	Guard	38	3-13	3-7	9-10	2	3	1	0	18
Jonnivius Smith	Forward	24	1-2	1-1	2-4	6	0	1	1	5
Tai'Reon Joseph	G	16	2-4	1-3	0-0	0	0	2	0	5
David Hermes	F	13	1-4	0-0	2-4	4	0	0	1	4
Damari Monsanto	Guard	13	1-6	1-6	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Baboucarr Njie	F	22	1-2	0-1	0-0	6	0	0	0	2

Tulsa

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keaston Willis	Guard	38	3-8	2-7	11-13	4	4	2	0	19
Isaiah Barnes	G	38	7-10	3-5	1-2	8	4	1	0	18
Dwon Odom	Guard	32	4-9	0-0	8-8	3	7	2	0	16
Jared Garcia	F	15	7-8	0-1	2-4	4	0	0	1	16
Tyshawn Archie	G	16	2-6	1-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	5
Braeden Carrington	G	25	1-3	1-2	0-0	5	0	2	1	3
Jesaiah McWright	G	11	1-2	0-0	1-2	1	1	0	0	3
Ian Smikle	F	25	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.8Possessions72.8

104.4Offensive Efficiency109.9

109.9Defensive Efficiency104.4

-5.5Net Efficiency5.5

42.6%Effective FG%60.6%

50.2%True Shooting %65.8%

15.1%Turnover Rate20.6%

50.8%Free Throw Rate61.7%

50.8%3-Point Rate38.3%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.20

Game Summary

Tulsa won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 72.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.