South Florida logo

South Florida

25-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.4%South Florida
30.6%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSouth Florida -4.6
PROJECTED TOTAL162.0
MODEL MONEYLINESouth Florida -227
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouth Florida 83
Projected Total162.0
Projected ScoreUAB 79

Team Comparison

68.8MMH Power Index56.9
117.3Offensive Efficiency110.5
101.6Defensive Efficiency102.9
15.7Net Efficiency7.6
1.8Strength of Schedule0.4
19.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
74.5Tempo71.7
51.0%Effective FG%48.8%
14.9%Turnover Rate12.4%
38.0%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
41.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
11.7Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

South Florida HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouth Florida holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.8–56.9), offensive efficiency (117.3–110.5), defensive efficiency (101.6–102.9), net efficiency (15.7–7.6).
UAB COUNTERS WITHball security (12.4–14.9).
Final
South Florida logo
South Florida
78—85
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 7 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South FloridaTEAM STATUAB
28-65FG29-65
43.0%FG%45.0%
7-163PT7-17
44.0%3PT%41.0%
15-20FT20-25
75.0%FT%80.0%
33Rebounds46
10Offensive Rebounds17
15Assists11
6Turnovers10
4Steals4
2Blocks11
15Fouls15

Player Box Score

South Florida
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jamille ReynoldsForward3510-190-07-10140000027
Jayden ReidG295-124-62-224300016
Kobe KnoxG313-50-14-433000010
Kasen JenningsG283-91-30-11100007
Quincy AdemokoyaGuard262-61-32-32101007
Brandon StroudGuard213-51-20-04000007
CJ BrownG232-80-10-00511004
Jimmie WilliamsG70-10-00-01100000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF407-151-26-6193160021
Ja'Borri McGheeG327-92-24-723210020
Alejandro VasquezGuard286-171-32-291010015
Butta JohnsonG233-72-43-412000011
Bradley EzewiroForward211-40-05-67002007
Tony ToneyGuard302-80-40-02211004
Christian ColemanG182-30-00-04000004
Tyren MooreG81-21-20-00000003

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2
111.1Offensive Efficiency121.1
121.1Defensive Efficiency111.1
-10.0Net Efficiency10.0
48.5%Effective FG%50.0%
52.3%True Shooting %55.3%
8.5%Turnover Rate14.3%
30.8%Free Throw Rate38.5%
24.6%3-Point Rate26.2%
2.50Assist / Turnover1.10
Game Summary
UAB won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.