Prairie View A&M

19-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.1%Prairie View A&M

61.9%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -4.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -162

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 72

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreGrambling 77

Team Comparison

Prairie View A&MMetricGrambling

41.6MMH Power Index41.4

105.6Offensive Efficiency100.7

103.9Defensive Efficiency100.4

1.7Net Efficiency0.3

-9.8Strength of Schedule-5.7

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

73.8Tempo69.9

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

15.9%Turnover Rate20.9%

27.7%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

42.9%Free Throw Rate42.2%

1.3Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Prairie View A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPrairie View A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.6–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.6–100.7), net efficiency (1.7–0.3), recent form (4.4–-0.4).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–103.9), strength of schedule (-5.7–-9.8), offensive rebounding (30.4–27.7).

Final

Prairie View A&M

48—70

Grambling

Grambling by 22 • 61.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Prairie View A&MTEAM STATGrambling

16-53FG27-62

30.0%FG%44.0%

7-223PT4-18

32.0%3PT%22.0%

9-12FT12-15

75.0%FT%80.0%

32Rebounds43

10Offensive Rebounds14

6Assists10

13Turnovers7

4Steals9

3Blocks4

11Fouls12

Player Box Score

Prairie View A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braelon Bush	G	34	6-12	4-6	4-4	2	2	0	1	20
Tanahj Pettway	Point Guard	36	3-12	2-7	4-4	6	0	0	0	12
Jordan Tillmon	Guard	24	5-15	1-4	1-2	4	1	1	0	12
Zaakir Sawyer	Guard	36	2-7	0-2	0-2	6	2	2	1	4
Elijah Terry	Forward	32	0-7	0-3	0-0	4	1	1	0	0
John-Paul Ricks	Guard	21	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Ryan Bolton Jr.	C	17	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Eason	F	27	7-10	0-0	3-3	10	1	1	2	17
Mikale Stevenson	G	31	6-14	2-4	2-2	4	2	2	0	16
Kintavious Dozier	G	31	6-9	1-4	1-2	5	2	1	0	14
Cbo Newton	G	20	2-5	0-2	2-2	6	1	1	0	6
James Flippin	F	25	2-6	0-0	0-0	4	2	1	1	4
Dupree Fletcher	Guard	17	1-3	0-1	1-2	2	2	2	0	3
Emareyon McDonald	Guard	14	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Lou Hutchinson	G	12	1-3	0-2	1-2	3	0	0	0	3
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	9	0-2	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Ernest Ross	Forward	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Antwan Burnett	G	10	0-5	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.9Possessions61.9

77.5Offensive Efficiency113.1

113.1Defensive Efficiency77.5

-35.5Net Efficiency35.5

36.8%Effective FG%46.8%

40.9%True Shooting %50.6%

21.1%Turnover Rate11.3%

22.6%Free Throw Rate24.2%

41.5%3-Point Rate29.0%

0.46Assist / Turnover1.43

Game Summary

Grambling won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 61.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.