SMU

20-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.4%SMU

28.6%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSMU -5.1

PROJECTED TOTAL159.8

MODEL MONEYLINESMU -250

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSMU 82

Projected Total159.8

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 77

Team Comparison

SMUMetricNotre Dame

62.5MMH Power Index49.7

118.2Offensive Efficiency110.3

109.6Defensive Efficiency111.2

8.6Net Efficiency-0.9

7.0Strength of Schedule4.7

-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

71.1Tempo68.0

55.7%Effective FG%53.0%

15.7%Turnover Rate17.0%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

31.3%Free Throw Rate34.7%

6.1Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–49.7), offensive efficiency (118.2–110.3), defensive efficiency (109.6–111.2), net efficiency (8.6–-0.9).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.7–31.3).

Final

SMU

97—73

Notre Dame

SMU by 24 • 71.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SMUTEAM STATNotre Dame

34-58FG23-55

59.0%FG%42.0%

8-203PT10-31

40.0%3PT%32.0%

21-27FT17-25

78.0%FT%68.0%

43Rebounds20

13Offensive Rebounds6

17Assists14

13Turnovers12

10Steals5

2Blocks1

19Fouls21

Player Box Score

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kario Oquendo	Guard	25	8-10	3-5	6-7	1	2	0	0	25
Matt Cross	Forward	26	5-9	2-4	2-2	9	2	3	1	14
Samet Yigitoglu	C	23	6-10	0-1	2-5	6	0	2	0	14
Chuck Harris	Guard	31	4-10	1-5	2-2	6	7	1	0	11
B.J. Edwards	G	30	3-5	1-1	1-2	6	4	3	0	8
Yohan Traore	F	12	3-5	0-1	2-2	2	0	0	0	8
AJ George	G	15	1-1	0-0	5-5	3	0	0	1	7
Tibet Gorener	Forward	14	1-1	1-1	1-2	0	0	1	0	4
Jerrell Colbert	F	10	2-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	4
Keon Ambrose-Hylton	Forward	14	1-4	0-2	0-0	5	1	0	0	2

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	27	6-11	5-8	4-4	2	0	0	0	21
Tae Davis	F	24	5-8	1-2	2-5	5	1	0	0	13
Garrett Sundra	F	14	3-4	2-3	3-3	2	0	1	1	11
Sir Mohammed	G	23	3-7	0-2	2-4	2	2	0	0	8
J.R. Konieczny	F	23	2-6	1-3	2-3	2	3	0	0	7
Logan Imes	G	8	2-4	0-2	2-2	1	2	2	0	6
Julian Roper II	Guard	10	1-2	1-2	0-2	0	0	1	0	3
Markus Burton	G	23	1-6	0-3	0-0	0	3	1	0	2
Cole Certa	G	10	0-3	0-3	2-2	1	1	0	0	2
Matt Allocco	Guard	19	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Kebba Njie	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.9Possessions71.9

134.9Offensive Efficiency101.5

101.5Defensive Efficiency134.9

33.4Net Efficiency-33.4

65.5%Effective FG%50.9%

68.5%True Shooting %54.6%

18.4%Turnover Rate16.5%

46.6%Free Throw Rate45.5%

34.5%3-Point Rate56.4%

1.31Assist / Turnover1.17

Game Summary

SMU won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 71.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.