
Fordham
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.5%Fordham
63.5%Duquesne
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuquesne -3.9
PROJECTED TOTAL144.8
MODEL MONEYLINEDuquesne -174

Duquesne
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 70
Projected Total144.8
Projected ScoreDuquesne 74
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index50.7
105.9Offensive Efficiency110.6
99.3Defensive Efficiency106.2
6.6Net Efficiency4.4
-2.4Strength of Schedule0.6
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9
65.9Tempo70.8
50.0%Effective FG%53.4%
17.3%Turnover Rate17.7%
34.5%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
26.9%Free Throw Rate38.2%
4.4Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fordham HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFordham holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (99.3–106.2), net efficiency (6.6–4.4), recent form (-0.9–-5.9), ball security (17.3–17.7).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.7–50.3), offensive efficiency (110.6–105.9), strength of schedule (0.6–-2.4).