
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.1%UAB
30.9%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -224

Rice
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 79
Projected Total153.0
Projected ScoreRice 74
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index45.1
110.5Offensive Efficiency108.3
102.9Defensive Efficiency109.2
7.6Net Efficiency-0.9
0.4Strength of Schedule-2.2
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
71.7Tempo68.3
48.8%Effective FG%49.7%
12.4%Turnover Rate17.8%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
36.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%
5.4Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–45.1), offensive efficiency (110.5–108.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.2), net efficiency (7.6–-0.9).
Rice COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.7–48.8), offensive rebounding (35.7–32.7).