New Hampshire logo

New Hampshire

9-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%New Hampshire
58.2%Binghamton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBinghamton -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL140.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -139
Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 69
Projected Total140.6
Projected ScoreBinghamton 72

Team Comparison

34MMH Power Index32.4
99.6Offensive Efficiency102.2
107.5Defensive Efficiency112.3
-7.9Net Efficiency-10.1
-3.4Strength of Schedule-6.0
-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2
69.4Tempo64.2
47.6%Effective FG%51.3%
16.1%Turnover Rate18.5%
26.7%Offensive Rebound %21.5%
29.4%Free Throw Rate42.8%
-5.5Average Margin-6.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

New Hampshire HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNew Hampshire holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (34.0–32.4), defensive efficiency (107.5–112.3), net efficiency (-7.9–-10.1), strength of schedule (-3.4–-6.0).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (102.2–99.6), recent form (-6.2–-17.6), shooting efficiency (51.3–47.6).
Final
New Hampshire logo
New Hampshire
60—79
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
Binghamton by 19 • 70.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATBinghamton
22-60FG27-52
37.0%FG%52.0%
5-243PT7-20
21.0%3PT%35.0%
11-20FT18-24
55.0%FT%75.0%
30Rebounds42
10Offensive Rebounds9
7Assists9
10Turnovers17
9Steals5
2Blocks3
18Fouls16

Player Box Score

New Hampshire
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Khalil BadruG286-101-11-430200014
Davide PoserF313-103-80-01000009
Anthony McComb IIIG244-110-41-62110009
Jawarie HamelinGuard312-80-34-47441008
Sami PissisG272-100-34-51200008
Caleb MiddletonC72-20-00-04000004
Antoni SiewrukG131-50-21-11000003
Dylan SaundersF101-31-30-00010003
Jon O'NeillF131-10-00-04000002
Emmanuel OkpomoForward150-00-00-02011000
Nick SanfordG10-00-00-00000000
Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Gavin WalshF354-80-27-12135300015
Tymu CheneryGuard276-90-12-392110014
Ben Callahan-GoldForward234-81-45-550000014
Chris WalkerG333-103-64-410010013
Wes Peterson Jr.G314-52-30-032100010
Evan AsheG263-61-20-05001007
Nehemiah BensonForward172-30-00-02000004
Stephan SnaggF21-10-00-01000002
Max SimsG30-20-20-00000000
Jayden LemondG20-00-00-00000000
Robby PhillipsGuard10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.5Possessions70.5
85.1Offensive Efficiency112.1
112.1Defensive Efficiency85.1
-27.0Net Efficiency27.0
40.8%Effective FG%58.7%
43.2%True Shooting %62.3%
14.4%Turnover Rate23.8%
33.3%Free Throw Rate46.2%
40.0%3-Point Rate38.5%
0.70Assist / Turnover0.53
Game Summary
Binghamton won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 70.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.