North Alabama

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.4%North Alabama

87.6%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -14.3

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -706

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 68

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreLipscomb 82

Team Comparison

North AlabamaMetricLipscomb

34.9MMH Power Index47.9

104.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

116.7Defensive Efficiency107.6

-12.3Net Efficiency3.7

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.5

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

66.5Tempo68.8

48.9%Effective FG%54.8%

17.2%Turnover Rate16.0%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

39.1%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-8.2Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–34.9), offensive efficiency (111.3–104.4), defensive efficiency (107.6–116.7), net efficiency (3.7–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–25.9), free throw rate (39.1–26.5).

Final

North Alabama

63—75

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 12 • 62.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North AlabamaTEAM STATLipscomb

22-52FG28-56

42.0%FG%50.0%

5-133PT11-27

38.0%3PT%41.0%

14-17FT8-10

82.0%FT%80.0%

28Rebounds33

6Offensive Rebounds7

4Assists10

9Turnovers8

6Steals6

5Blocks4

11Fouls11

Player Box Score

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacari Lane	G	36	6-15	2-3	4-7	3	3	2	1	18
Taye Fields	Guard	35	4-9	1-1	4-4	2	0	2	4	13
Donte Bacchus	F	24	4-7	0-1	4-4	7	0	1	0	12
Will Soucie	Guard	33	4-6	0-1	0-0	5	0	0	0	8
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	27	2-11	1-6	0-0	5	1	0	0	5
Corneilous Williams	F	20	1-1	0-0	2-2	5	0	0	0	4
Canin Jefferson	G	19	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
DarKaun King	F	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Ognacevic	F	40	8-13	2-4	3-4	8	0	0	0	21
Will Pruitt	Guard	39	6-13	3-6	3-4	6	0	1	0	18
Gyasi Powell	Guard	35	6-11	3-6	2-2	7	6	0	0	17
Joe Anderson	Guard	37	6-11	3-7	0-0	1	3	4	1	15
Charlie Williams	C	13	2-8	0-4	0-0	2	0	0	1	4
Grant Asman	F	20	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	0
Miles White	G	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	1	0
Kellan Boylan	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.5Possessions62.5

100.8Offensive Efficiency120.0

120.0Defensive Efficiency100.8

-19.2Net Efficiency19.2

47.1%Effective FG%59.8%

52.4%True Shooting %61.7%

14.3%Turnover Rate13.0%

32.7%Free Throw Rate17.9%

25.0%3-Point Rate48.2%

0.44Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 62.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.