
TCU
23-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.0%TCU
67.0%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -203

Cincinnati
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTCU 70
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreCincinnati 75
Team Comparison
59.7MMH Power Index61.5
110.2Offensive Efficiency105.3
102.7Defensive Efficiency97.3
7.5Net Efficiency8.0
4.6Strength of Schedule5.1
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
70.2Tempo69.4
50.5%Effective FG%50.6%
15.3%Turnover Rate17.0%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
38.3%Free Throw Rate30.7%
5.3Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY67.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–59.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–102.7), net efficiency (8.0–7.5), strength of schedule (5.1–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.2–105.3), ball security (15.3–17.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–30.6).