
Charleston
21-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.5%Charleston
42.5%Drexel
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL142.1
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston -135

Drexel
17-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCharleston 71
Projected Total142.1
Projected ScoreDrexel 71
Team Comparison
53.8MMH Power Index46.5
109.2Offensive Efficiency103.6
106.2Defensive Efficiency102.4
3.0Net Efficiency1.2
1.9Strength of Schedule-0.4
3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
69.1Tempo65.7
50.6%Effective FG%51.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate19.1%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
42.1%Free Throw Rate32.3%
2.0Average Margin0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Charleston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharleston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.6), net efficiency (3.0–1.2), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.4).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–106.2), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.6), offensive rebounding (30.7–29.6).