Maine

8-24

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.2%Maine

53.8%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL132.5

MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -116

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMaine 65

Projected Total132.5

Projected ScoreBinghamton 67

Team Comparison

MaineMetricBinghamton

35.6MMH Power Index32.4

95.6Offensive Efficiency102.2

104.6Defensive Efficiency112.3

-9.0Net Efficiency-10.1

-1.8Strength of Schedule-6.0

-6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

65.4Tempo64.2

50.5%Effective FG%51.3%

19.0%Turnover Rate18.5%

19.4%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

38.5%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-5.9Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–95.6), recent form (-6.2–-6.8), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.5), ball security (18.5–19.0).

Maine COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (35.6–32.4), defensive efficiency (104.6–112.3), net efficiency (-9.0–-10.1).

Final

Maine

69—71

Binghamton

Binghamton by 2 • 60.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MaineTEAM STATBinghamton

23-58FG28-57

40.0%FG%49.0%

13-303PT9-18

43.0%3PT%50.0%

10-12FT6-10

83.0%FT%60.0%

30Rebounds39

9Offensive Rebounds12

16Assists16

6Turnovers11

6Steals4

4Blocks1

15Fouls10

Player Box Score

Maine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Quion Burns	Guard	29	6-16	3-9	3-4	8	0	0	1	18
Christopher Mantis	Forward	22	6-9	5-8	0-0	1	0	0	0	17
Kellen Tynes	Guard	35	3-7	3-4	1-2	5	8	3	0	10
AJ Lopez	G	35	2-8	1-5	4-4	0	0	0	0	9
Jaden Clayton	G	31	3-8	1-3	0-0	3	5	2	0	7
Killian Gribben	F	21	1-4	0-0	2-2	7	0	0	2	4
Keelan Steele	F	16	2-5	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	1	4
Logan Carey	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	3	0	0	0
Novak Perovic	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chris Walker	G	36	7-15	4-7	1-1	4	3	1	0	19
Tymu Chenery	Guard	40	7-14	1-4	0-0	9	6	1	0	15
Gavin Walsh	F	32	5-9	1-1	2-4	8	1	0	0	13
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	37	4-8	2-2	2-3	4	1	1	0	12
Evan Ashe	G	33	2-4	1-3	1-2	8	2	1	1	6
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	15	3-6	0-0	0-0	4	3	0	0	6
Ben Callahan-Gold	Forward	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.8Possessions60.8

113.5Offensive Efficiency116.8

116.8Defensive Efficiency113.5

-3.3Net Efficiency3.3

50.9%Effective FG%57.0%

54.2%True Shooting %57.5%

9.9%Turnover Rate18.1%

20.7%Free Throw Rate17.5%

51.7%3-Point Rate31.6%

2.67Assist / Turnover1.45

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 60.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.