Pittsburgh

13-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.7%Pittsburgh

60.3%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -3.7

PROJECTED TOTAL147.5

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -152

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePittsburgh 72

Projected Total147.5

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 76

Team Comparison

PittsburghMetricNotre Dame

50.5MMH Power Index49.7

108.4Offensive Efficiency110.3

110.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

-2.0Net Efficiency-0.9

5.5Strength of Schedule4.7

-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

65.0Tempo68.0

51.4%Effective FG%53.0%

17.3%Turnover Rate17.0%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

31.2%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-1.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Notre Dame HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNotre Dame holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (110.3–108.4), net efficiency (-0.9–-2.0), shooting efficiency (53.0–51.4), ball security (17.0–17.3).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.5–49.7), defensive efficiency (110.4–111.2), strength of schedule (5.5–4.7).

Final

Pittsburgh

72—76

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 4 • 62.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATNotre Dame

27-53FG27-48

51.0%FG%56.0%

7-203PT6-17

35.0%3PT%35.0%

11-18FT16-20

61.0%FT%80.0%

24Rebounds28

9Offensive Rebounds7

9Assists12

10Turnovers11

6Steals6

1Blocks1

16Fouls18

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	37	8-14	3-8	2-4	3	1	1	0	21
Cameron Corhen	F	35	8-11	0-0	4-6	7	1	0	0	20
Jaland Lowe	G	39	5-14	0-3	3-3	3	4	4	0	13
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	38	4-8	3-5	0-3	5	1	0	1	11
Zack Austin	Forward	38	1-4	1-3	2-2	3	2	1	0	5
Brandin Cummings	G	10	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Amsal Delalic	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tae Davis	F	38	8-11	1-3	4-6	3	2	1	1	21
Markus Burton	G	39	8-17	2-8	2-2	6	3	0	0	20
Cole Certa	G	12	3-4	3-4	3-4	0	1	0	0	12
J.R. Konieczny	F	29	2-4	0-1	6-6	5	0	2	0	10
Kebba Njie	F	28	4-7	0-0	0-0	7	0	1	0	8
Sir Mohammed	G	18	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	3	2	0	2
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Logan Imes	G	14	0-3	0-1	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Garrett Sundra	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Julian Roper II	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	3	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.1Possessions62.1

115.9Offensive Efficiency122.4

122.4Defensive Efficiency115.9

-6.4Net Efficiency6.4

57.5%Effective FG%62.5%

58.5%True Shooting %66.1%

16.0%Turnover Rate17.9%

34.0%Free Throw Rate41.7%

37.7%3-Point Rate35.4%

0.90Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 62.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.