Sam Houston

22-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.3%Sam Houston

52.7%Middle Tennessee

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiddle Tennessee -0.9

PROJECTED TOTAL155.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMiddle Tennessee -111

Middle Tennessee

17-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSam Houston 77

Projected Total155.4

Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 78

Team Comparison

Sam HoustonMetricMiddle Tennessee

56.1MMH Power Index52.5

115.5Offensive Efficiency109.6

105.5Defensive Efficiency105.7

10.0Net Efficiency3.9

-2.2Strength of Schedule0.4

3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2

71.2Tempo68.8

53.2%Effective FG%52.2%

16.6%Turnover Rate16.7%

37.4%Offensive Rebound %31.3%

34.8%Free Throw Rate33.2%

7.1Average Margin2.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–52.5), offensive efficiency (115.5–109.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–105.7), net efficiency (10.0–3.9).

Middle Tennessee COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.4–-2.2).

Final

Sam Houston

70—74

Middle Tennessee

Middle Tennessee by 4 • 62.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Sam HoustonTEAM STATMiddle Tennessee

25-52FG26-58

48.0%FG%45.0%

12-193PT10-23

63.0%3PT%43.0%

8-13FT12-17

62.0%FT%71.0%

28Rebounds36

9Offensive Rebounds16

9Assists14

14Turnovers11

6Steals7

5Blocks4

17Fouls17

Player Box Score

Sam Houston

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Lamar Wilkerson	G	37	8-13	5-6	3-5	4	1	2	0	24
Erik Taylor	G	20	4-7	2-3	1-1	0	0	1	0	11
Cameron Huefner	Forward	28	3-7	2-5	2-2	3	1	2	1	10
Kalifa Sakho	F	32	4-7	0-0	1-2	6	1	0	4	9
Marcus Boykin	Guard	32	3-7	1-1	1-3	3	4	0	0	8
Josiah Hammons	G	25	2-8	2-3	0-0	5	0	1	0	6
Brennen Burns	Guard	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	2
Jaxson Ford	F	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Cheikh Ndiaye	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Middle Tennessee

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tre Green	G	29	5-10	5-9	2-2	3	0	1	0	17
Essam Mostafa	Forward	22	6-13	0-0	1-1	8	2	2	0	13
Camryn Weston	Guard	25	3-10	1-4	2-3	3	5	2	0	9
Chris Loofe	F	18	4-6	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	2	9
Jlynn Counter	G	28	2-5	1-4	2-2	2	6	1	1	7
Justin Bufford	Guard	16	1-1	1-1	4-7	2	0	1	0	7
Jestin Porter	G	32	2-7	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Torey Alston	F	18	2-5	0-0	1-2	2	1	0	1	5
Jacob Johnson	Guard	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Kamari Lands	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.2Possessions62.2

112.5Offensive Efficiency119.0

119.0Defensive Efficiency112.5

-6.4Net Efficiency6.4

59.6%Effective FG%53.4%

60.2%True Shooting %56.0%

22.2%Turnover Rate18.0%

25.0%Free Throw Rate29.3%

36.5%3-Point Rate39.7%

0.64Assist / Turnover1.27

Game Summary

Middle Tennessee won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 62.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.