
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.2%Hofstra
15.8%Delaware
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -10.6
PROJECTED TOTAL142.0
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -533

Delaware
10-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 76
Projected Total142.0
Projected ScoreDelaware 66
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index39.7
114.0Offensive Efficiency103.3
100.9Defensive Efficiency112.9
13.1Net Efficiency-9.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule3.4
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.8
66.2Tempo65.5
52.2%Effective FG%52.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate18.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %20.5%
32.0%Free Throw Rate31.2%
8.7Average Margin-6.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–39.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.9), net efficiency (13.1–-9.6).
Delaware COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.4–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.2).