Hofstra logo

Hofstra

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.2%Hofstra
15.8%Delaware
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -10.6
PROJECTED TOTAL142.0
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -533
Delaware logo

Delaware

10-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 76
Projected Total142.0
Projected ScoreDelaware 66

Team Comparison

59.3MMH Power Index39.7
114.0Offensive Efficiency103.3
100.9Defensive Efficiency112.9
13.1Net Efficiency-9.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule3.4
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.8
66.2Tempo65.5
52.2%Effective FG%52.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate18.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %20.5%
32.0%Free Throw Rate31.2%
8.7Average Margin-6.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–39.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.9), net efficiency (13.1–-9.6).
Delaware COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.4–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.2).
Final
Hofstra logo
Hofstra
78—65
Delaware logo
Delaware
Hofstra by 13 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATDelaware
30-57FG25-53
53.0%FG%47.0%
13-243PT4-20
54.0%3PT%20.0%
5-6FT11-13
83.0%FT%85.0%
27Rebounds29
6Offensive Rebounds8
19Assists8
13Turnovers15
7Steals7
4Blocks2
15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Hofstra
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cruz DavisG4011-206-90-054200028
Khalil FarmerG407-133-62-273010019
Eric ParnellG244-92-50-000000010
German PlotnikovG402-62-42-22330008
Jean ArangurenG153-50-00-00610006
Michael GrahamForward192-30-00-06012004
Silas SundayF161-10-00-04201002
Joshua DeCadyF60-00-01-21100001
Delaware
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Niels LaneGuard3511-202-40-0101000024
Izaiah PashaG365-90-22-233210012
John CamdenF394-111-50-02110009
Macon EmoryF301-31-34-55010007
Trent Middleton Jr.G102-30-13-41100007
Cavan ReillyG262-40-22-22020006
Erik TimkoGuard180-20-20-05211000
Tahron AllenNot Available40-10-10-00000000
Kevin KogbaraForward20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6
117.1Offensive Efficiency97.6
97.6Defensive Efficiency117.1
19.5Net Efficiency-19.5
64.0%Effective FG%50.9%
65.2%True Shooting %54.9%
19.4%Turnover Rate22.7%
10.5%Free Throw Rate24.5%
42.1%3-Point Rate37.7%
1.46Assist / Turnover0.53
Game Summary
Hofstra won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.