
Pepperdine
9-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.0%Pepperdine
86.0%Loyola Marymount
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLoyola Marymount -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.8
MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Marymount -614

Loyola Marymount
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePepperdine 69
Projected Total150.8
Projected ScoreLoyola Marymount 82
Team Comparison
38.2MMH Power Index49.9
103.2Offensive Efficiency107.0
113.6Defensive Efficiency103.8
-10.4Net Efficiency3.2
0.7Strength of Schedule0.5
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.2
70.0Tempo69.4
48.7%Effective FG%52.8%
18.3%Turnover Rate17.2%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %27.3%
34.0%Free Throw Rate32.1%
-7.3Average Margin2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Loyola Marymount HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Marymount holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.9–38.2), offensive efficiency (107.0–103.2), defensive efficiency (103.8–113.6), net efficiency (3.2–-10.4).
Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–0.5), offensive rebounding (31.1–27.3), free throw rate (34.0–32.1).