
Temple
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Temple
76.5%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -326

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 71
Projected Total150.7
Projected ScoreUAB 80
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index56.9
112.2Offensive Efficiency110.5
107.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
4.8Net Efficiency7.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule0.4
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
65.9Tempo71.7
51.1%Effective FG%48.8%
13.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
42.3%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–50.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.4), net efficiency (7.6–4.8), strength of schedule (0.4–-2.0).
Temple COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.2–110.5), shooting efficiency (51.1–48.8), free throw rate (42.3–36.9).