Temple logo

Temple

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Temple
76.5%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL150.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -326
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 71
Projected Total150.7
Projected ScoreUAB 80

Team Comparison

TempleMetricUAB
50.9MMH Power Index56.9
112.2Offensive Efficiency110.5
107.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
4.8Net Efficiency7.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule0.4
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
65.9Tempo71.7
51.1%Effective FG%48.8%
13.7%Turnover Rate12.4%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
42.3%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–50.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–107.4), net efficiency (7.6–4.8), strength of schedule (0.4–-2.0).
Temple COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.2–110.5), shooting efficiency (51.1–48.8), free throw rate (42.3–36.9).
Final
Temple logo
Temple
64—80
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 16 • 65.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TempleTEAM STATUAB
25-60FG31-71
42.0%FG%44.0%
5-173PT8-22
29.0%3PT%36.0%
9-12FT10-13
75.0%FT%77.0%
31Rebounds47
10Offensive Rebounds21
10Assists21
10Turnovers8
3Steals6
4Blocks4
14Fouls10

Player Box Score

Temple
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zion StanfordG357-200-23-381010017
Steve Settle IIIForward355-92-40-231110012
Shane DezonieGuard304-91-32-233100011
Elijah GrayF174-91-20-03100009
Dillon BattieF103-30-01-11000007
Aiden TobiasonG381-71-53-45410006
Mohamed KeitaC41-10-00-00000002
Babatunde DurodolaF190-10-00-04002000
Matteo PicarelliNot Available120-10-10-03000000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Bradley EzewiroForward236-100-03-571010015
Tony ToneyGuard345-134-100-041100014
Yaxel LendeborgF314-100-25-6118100013
Ja'Borri McGheeG315-111-12-2107200013
Christian ColemanG266-90-00-072020012
Alejandro VasquezGuard243-91-20-03000007
Tyren MooreG92-42-30-01010006
Butta JohnsonG220-50-40-00211000

Advanced Game Stats

65.0Possessions65.0
98.5Offensive Efficiency123.1
123.1Defensive Efficiency98.5
-24.6Net Efficiency24.6
45.8%Effective FG%49.3%
48.7%True Shooting %51.8%
15.2%Turnover Rate12.5%
20.0%Free Throw Rate18.3%
28.3%3-Point Rate31.0%
1.00Assist / Turnover2.63
Game Summary
UAB won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 65.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.