Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.8%Lipscomb

78.2%Austin Peay

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAustin Peay -9.4

PROJECTED TOTAL155.4

MODEL MONEYLINEAustin Peay -359

Austin Peay

22-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 73

Projected Total155.4

Projected ScoreAustin Peay 82

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricAustin Peay

47.9MMH Power Index54.8

111.3Offensive Efficiency115.0

107.6Defensive Efficiency103.1

3.7Net Efficiency11.9

-2.5Strength of Schedule-5.8

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency8.1

68.8Tempo71.0

54.8%Effective FG%53.9%

16.0%Turnover Rate15.3%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %30.3%

26.5%Free Throw Rate39.0%

2.5Average Margin8.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–47.9), offensive efficiency (115.0–111.3), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.6), net efficiency (11.9–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-5.8), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.9).

Final

Lipscomb

95—78

Austin Peay

Lipscomb by 17 • 58.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATAustin Peay

29-48FG30-60

60.0%FG%50.0%

18-283PT9-21

64.0%3PT%43.0%

19-20FT9-12

95.0%FT%75.0%

25Rebounds25

5Offensive Rebounds11

18Assists12

6Turnovers4

2Steals3

3Blocks4

11Fouls15

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Ognacevic	F	36	8-12	4-4	8-8	4	5	0	1	28
Joe Anderson	Guard	36	6-8	5-6	4-4	2	2	0	0	21
Will Pruitt	Guard	34	5-10	4-8	1-2	6	4	0	0	15
Charlie Williams	C	22	3-3	1-1	2-2	4	3	1	2	9
Gyasi Powell	Guard	31	2-8	2-5	0-0	3	2	0	0	6
Miles White	G	12	2-3	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Grant Asman	F	14	2-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	4
Kellan Boylan	F	5	0-0	0-0	4-4	0	0	0	0	4
Ross Candelino	G	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Logan Suber	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Rylan Houck	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Jack Ingold	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Austin Peay

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Isaac Haney	Guard	34	7-14	3-7	7-7	4	3	0	0	24
LJ Thomas	G	18	7-9	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	14
Me'Kell Burries	Guard	22	4-9	3-5	0-1	3	0	0	0	11
Tate McCubbin	G	29	2-5	2-4	0-0	5	0	1	0	6
Darius Dawson	Guard	10	3-7	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Quan Lax	PG	27	1-6	1-3	1-2	1	2	0	1	4
Hansel Enmanuel	PG	23	2-2	0-0	0-0	7	2	1	3	4
Daniel Loos	Forward	10	1-1	0-0	1-2	2	1	0	0	3
JaVar Daniel	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Akili Evans	Guard	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Terrell Gaines	PG	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Anton Brookshire	PG	13	0-4	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

58.6Possessions58.6

162.1Offensive Efficiency133.1

133.1Defensive Efficiency162.1

29.0Net Efficiency-29.0

79.2%Effective FG%57.5%

82.6%True Shooting %59.4%

10.3%Turnover Rate6.8%

41.7%Free Throw Rate20.0%

58.3%3-Point Rate35.0%

3.00Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 58.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.