Florida A&M logo

Florida A&M

14-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.3%Florida A&M
69.7%Alabama A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -6.6
PROJECTED TOTAL145.1
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -230
Alabama A&M logo

Alabama A&M

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 69
Projected Total145.1
Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 76

Team Comparison

39.4MMH Power Index42.3
98.7Offensive Efficiency105.9
105.6Defensive Efficiency106.6
-6.9Net Efficiency-0.7
-3.2Strength of Schedule-6.8
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
70.6Tempo68.0
49.2%Effective FG%49.7%
21.6%Turnover Rate16.8%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %28.0%
38.0%Free Throw Rate45.7%
-4.8Average Margin-0.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–39.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–98.7), net efficiency (-0.7–-6.9), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–106.6), strength of schedule (-3.2–-6.8), recent form (4.5–3.3).
Final
Florida A&M logo
Florida A&M
66—77
Alabama A&M logo
Alabama A&M
Alabama A&M by 11 • 70.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATAlabama A&M
19-46FG23-52
41.0%FG%44.0%
10-263PT9-20
38.0%3PT%45.0%
18-24FT22-30
75.0%FT%73.0%
28Rebounds34
6Offensive Rebounds12
12Assists18
19Turnovers16
9Steals7
2Blocks3
18Fouls20

Player Box Score

Florida A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Sterling YoungG378-192-813-1420100031
Milton Matthews IIIG376-96-91-260200019
Jordan ChatmanG322-82-71-23311007
Ja'Derryus EatmonForward232-20-00-04111004
Jamine CharlesForward111-20-02-42010004
Kaleb WashingtonF200-10-11-21010001
Roderick Coffee IIIF360-50-10-06810000
Shaqir O'NealF20-00-00-00000000
Miles HallGuard20-00-00-00000000
Lenard Taylor Jr.G00-00-00-00010000
Alabama A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dylan McleanGuard275-103-56-712200019
AC BryantG275-91-22-553200013
Chad MoodieF332-60-05-87603009
Saliou SeyeF233-91-22-26110009
Lorenzo DowneyGuard283-51-20-07210007
London RileyGuard192-32-30-00000006
Darius FordGuard101-30-13-41000005
Bilal Abdur-RahmanG100-00-04-42100004
Jaylen ColonGuard91-31-30-01210003
Warren YehGuard51-20-10-00000002
Aaron SmithGuard50-10-10-02100000
Angok AnyangF40-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.4Possessions70.4
93.7Offensive Efficiency109.4
109.4Defensive Efficiency93.7
-15.6Net Efficiency15.6
52.2%Effective FG%52.9%
57.5%True Shooting %58.1%
27.0%Turnover Rate22.8%
52.2%Free Throw Rate57.7%
56.5%3-Point Rate38.5%
0.63Assist / Turnover1.13
Game Summary
Alabama A&M won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 70.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.