Toledo logo

Toledo

19-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.7%Toledo
51.3%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -105
Kent State logo

Kent State

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreToledo 82
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreKent State 84

Team Comparison

58.8MMH Power Index54.7
116.0Offensive Efficiency113.9
109.6Defensive Efficiency107.6
6.4Net Efficiency6.3
2.3Strength of Schedule-0.1
10.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
69.8Tempo74.0
55.1%Effective FG%53.0%
14.6%Turnover Rate17.7%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
30.3%Free Throw Rate43.5%
4.5Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Toledo HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMToledo holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.8–54.7), offensive efficiency (116.0–113.9), net efficiency (6.4–6.3), strength of schedule (2.3–-0.1).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–109.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–30.4), free throw rate (43.5–30.3).
Final
Toledo logo
Toledo
65—105
Kent State logo
Kent State
Kent State by 40 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ToledoTEAM STATKent State
24-57FG43-73
42.0%FG%59.0%
2-133PT9-24
15.0%3PT%38.0%
15-20FT10-15
75.0%FT%67.0%
24Rebounds43
11Offensive Rebounds19
7Assists15
14Turnovers8
7Steals11
3Blocks5
16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Toledo
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Sam LewisG306-131-34-440310017
Sonny WilsonG306-130-21-110100013
Isaiah AdamsGuard283-71-33-443000010
Javan SimmonsF274-80-02-371120010
Grgur BrcicC133-40-00-22000006
Bryce FordG271-50-23-42200005
Seth HubbardG191-40-22-21020004
Jaylan OuwingaF190-20-00-00100000
Tyler OdeG40-00-00-00000000
Andre LorentssonForward30-10-10-00000000
Kent State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
VonCameron DavisForward288-155-80-010010021
Jamal SumlinG329-140-02-467200020
Marquis BarnettNot Available198-122-61-121300019
Delrecco GillespieF246-81-13-360410016
Cli'Ron HornbeakCenter195-60-13-491030013
Jalen SullingerGuard283-80-40-03200006
Cian MedleyG142-31-20-22100005
Magnus EntenmannF91-30-01-12010003
Donovan HunterF61-40-20-02000002
Mike BekeljaGuard210-00-00-05310000

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3
93.8Offensive Efficiency151.5
151.5Defensive Efficiency93.8
-57.7Net Efficiency57.7
43.9%Effective FG%65.1%
48.9%True Shooting %65.5%
20.1%Turnover Rate11.6%
35.1%Free Throw Rate20.5%
22.8%3-Point Rate32.9%
0.50Assist / Turnover1.88
Game Summary
Kent State won by 40 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.