Central Arkansas

22-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.3%Central Arkansas

45.7%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCentral Arkansas -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINECentral Arkansas -119

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCentral Arkansas 78

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreLipscomb 78

Team Comparison

Central ArkansasMetricLipscomb

54MMH Power Index47.9

113.9Offensive Efficiency111.3

105.2Defensive Efficiency107.6

8.7Net Efficiency3.7

-3.9Strength of Schedule-2.5

9.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

71.0Tempo68.8

54.3%Effective FG%54.8%

15.3%Turnover Rate16.0%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

30.7%Free Throw Rate26.5%

6.1Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Central Arkansas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Arkansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–47.9), offensive efficiency (113.9–111.3), defensive efficiency (105.2–107.6), net efficiency (8.7–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-3.9), shooting efficiency (54.8–54.3).

Final

Central Arkansas

60—78

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 18 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Central ArkansasTEAM STATLipscomb

23-53FG26-58

43.0%FG%45.0%

4-203PT13-33

20.0%3PT%39.0%

10-14FT13-15

71.0%FT%87.0%

29Rebounds36

5Offensive Rebounds8

7Assists19

12Turnovers10

9Steals9

3Blocks5

13Fouls11

Player Box Score

Central Arkansas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nehemiah Turner	F	28	8-14	1-2	7-10	6	3	1	1	24
Brayden Fagbemi	G	39	5-12	1-5	2-2	2	3	3	0	13
Elias Cato	Forward	35	5-13	0-5	0-0	6	0	3	1	10
Ben Fox	Guard	29	2-4	1-3	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Cole McCormick	F	24	2-4	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	5
Owen Derhmann	G	12	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Ethan Thomas	G	1	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Diogo Seixas	Forward	22	0-5	0-3	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Ubong-Abasi Etim	C	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Jabari West Jr.	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Connor Mancell	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Ognacevic	F	38	6-9	1-3	7-8	11	1	0	2	20
Charlie Williams	C	24	6-8	3-4	0-0	3	2	0	2	15
Joe Anderson	Guard	36	4-11	3-9	2-3	1	6	4	0	13
Gyasi Powell	Guard	32	4-8	2-6	3-3	2	2	0	0	13
Will Pruitt	Guard	34	4-13	3-6	1-1	9	5	0	1	12
Miles White	G	13	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	2	2	0	3
Jack Ingold	Guard	1	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Grant Asman	F	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Kellan Boylan	F	6	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	2	0	0
Rylan Houck	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Logan Suber	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Ross Candelino	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9

89.7Offensive Efficiency116.6

116.6Defensive Efficiency89.7

-26.9Net Efficiency26.9

47.2%Effective FG%56.0%

50.3%True Shooting %59.9%

18.0%Turnover Rate14.9%

26.4%Free Throw Rate25.9%

37.7%3-Point Rate56.9%

0.58Assist / Turnover1.90

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.