
UT Arlington
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.2%UT Arlington
83.8%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -10.7
PROJECTED TOTAL140.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -517

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 65
Projected Total140.1
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 75
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index59.8
102.7Offensive Efficiency109.2
97.9Defensive Efficiency99.1
4.8Net Efficiency10.1
-0.8Strength of Schedule2.0
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
68.1Tempo69.3
48.5%Effective FG%52.1%
20.4%Turnover Rate17.6%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
43.7%Free Throw Rate41.0%
3.3Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (109.2–102.7), net efficiency (10.1–4.8), strength of schedule (2.0–-0.8).
UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–99.1), offensive rebounding (36.0–31.2), free throw rate (43.7–41.0).