Longwood

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.7%Longwood

53.3%South Carolina Upstate

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSouth Carolina Upstate -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL151.9

MODEL MONEYLINESouth Carolina Upstate -114

South Carolina Upstate

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLongwood 75

Projected Total151.9

Projected ScoreSouth Carolina Upstate 77

Team Comparison

LongwoodMetricSouth Carolina Upstate

47MMH Power Index43.6

108.1Offensive Efficiency104.5

103.0Defensive Efficiency103.7

5.1Net Efficiency0.8

-6.4Strength of Schedule-3.8

2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.9

71.9Tempo71.1

51.4%Effective FG%50.3%

19.3%Turnover Rate17.6%

35.4%Offensive Rebound %30.1%

42.0%Free Throw Rate34.0%

3.6Average Margin0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Longwood HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–43.6), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.5), defensive efficiency (103.0–103.7), net efficiency (5.1–0.8).

South Carolina Upstate COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.8–-6.4), ball security (17.6–19.3).

Final

Longwood

83—66

South Carolina Upstate

Longwood by 17 • 72.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LongwoodTEAM STATSouth Carolina Upstate

33-65FG23-51

51.0%FG%45.0%

7-233PT6-28

30.0%3PT%21.0%

10-13FT14-22

77.0%FT%64.0%

40Rebounds24

15Offensive Rebounds7

17Assists10

16Turnovers18

12Steals11

1Blocks5

18Fouls9

Player Box Score

Longwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kyrell Luc	Guard	28	6-11	1-4	2-3	3	3	4	0	15
Michael Christmas	Forward	23	5-10	3-7	0-0	5	0	0	0	13
Colby Garland	G	28	4-11	0-4	4-4	2	4	0	0	12
Trey Hicks	Forward	19	5-7	0-0	2-2	5	1	1	0	12
Angelo Brizzi	G	25	4-10	2-5	0-0	6	3	3	1	10
Johan Nziemi	F	18	4-5	1-1	1-2	6	0	2	0	10
Elijah Tucker	F	13	3-5	0-0	1-2	2	1	1	0	7
Jaylen Benard	G	23	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Emanuel Richards	G	21	1-4	0-1	0-0	6	4	1	0	2
Precious Idiaru	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Leo Nordberg	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

South Carolina Upstate

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mister Dean	G	18	6-10	1-2	4-8	8	1	2	1	17
Brit Harris	G	23	5-10	3-6	2-2	1	1	0	2	15
Daniel Helterhoff	F	19	3-4	1-2	4-5	3	1	1	0	11
Karmani Gregory	G	28	3-7	1-5	0-0	0	1	3	0	7
Carmelo Adkins	G	26	2-4	0-2	1-2	2	4	0	0	5
Nic Book	F	19	2-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	4
Chico Johnson	G	26	1-3	0-1	1-3	3	0	1	2	3
Andrew McConnell	G	20	1-6	0-5	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Isaiah Skinner	G	18	0-4	0-4	2-2	1	1	3	0	2
CJ Rich	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.4Possessions72.4

114.6Offensive Efficiency91.2

91.2Defensive Efficiency114.6

23.5Net Efficiency-23.5

56.2%Effective FG%51.0%

58.3%True Shooting %53.7%

22.2%Turnover Rate24.8%

20.0%Free Throw Rate43.1%

35.4%3-Point Rate54.9%

1.06Assist / Turnover0.56

Game Summary

Longwood won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 72.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.