
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.8%Tulane
94.2%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -19.6
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -1624

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 68
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreTulsa 88
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index64.8
105.3Offensive Efficiency121.1
109.9Defensive Efficiency104.8
-4.6Net Efficiency16.3
2.7Strength of Schedule0.0
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
68.7Tempo70.2
49.6%Effective FG%55.4%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.4%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
44.8%Free Throw Rate42.4%
-3.2Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–44.3), offensive efficiency (121.1–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.9), net efficiency (16.3–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.0), free throw rate (44.8–42.4).