North Carolina A&T

11-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.9%North Carolina A&T

92.1%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -17.1

PROJECTED TOTAL149.0

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -1166

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Carolina A&T 66

Projected Total149.0

Projected ScoreHofstra 83

Team Comparison

North Carolina A&TMetricHofstra

41.8MMH Power Index59.3

107.4Offensive Efficiency114.0

111.4Defensive Efficiency100.9

-4.0Net Efficiency13.1

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.9

-11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

69.9Tempo66.2

51.5%Effective FG%52.2%

18.4%Turnover Rate16.1%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

46.7%Free Throw Rate32.0%

-2.8Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–41.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–107.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–111.4), net efficiency (13.1–-4.0).

North Carolina A&T COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), free throw rate (46.7–32.0).

Final

North Carolina A&T

49—70

Hofstra

Hofstra by 21 • 62.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North Carolina A&TTEAM STATHofstra

15-53FG27-59

28.0%FG%46.0%

7-243PT8-24

29.0%3PT%33.0%

12-18FT8-11

67.0%FT%73.0%

30Rebounds45

10Offensive Rebounds14

11Assists13

11Turnovers12

5Steals7

5Blocks7

11Fouls13

Player Box Score

North Carolina A&T

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jahnathan Lamothe	G	40	7-20	4-13	7-8	6	2	2	0	25
Efstratios Kalliontzis	C	36	3-5	0-0	3-6	9	0	0	1	9
Bryson Ogletree	G	31	2-7	2-5	0-0	2	0	2	1	6
Camian Shell	G	40	1-8	1-4	2-2	3	4	1	1	5
Nikolaos Chitikoudis	F	37	2-9	0-0	0-2	9	5	0	2	4
Jalal McKie	G	16	0-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jean Aranguren	G	39	8-15	2-5	2-2	9	4	2	0	20
Cruz Davis	G	38	5-15	1-5	3-5	7	8	2	1	14
Eric Parnell	G	29	4-7	4-7	0-0	2	0	0	0	12
Michael Graham	Forward	23	5-6	0-0	1-2	6	0	0	2	11
German Plotnikov	G	39	2-9	1-6	2-2	7	1	3	1	7
Silas Sunday	F	17	3-4	0-0	0-0	9	0	0	3	6
Khalil Farmer	G	11	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joshua DeCady	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.4Possessions62.4

78.5Offensive Efficiency112.2

112.2Defensive Efficiency78.5

-33.7Net Efficiency33.7

34.9%Effective FG%52.5%

39.8%True Shooting %54.5%

17.6%Turnover Rate19.3%

34.0%Free Throw Rate18.6%

45.3%3-Point Rate40.7%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 62.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.