Northeastern

8-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.5%Northeastern

87.5%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -14.3

PROJECTED TOTAL162.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -700

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNortheastern 74

Projected Total162.4

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 88

Team Comparison

NortheasternMetricWilliam & Mary

40.9MMH Power Index53.8

107.1Offensive Efficiency112.5

115.7Defensive Efficiency105.2

-8.6Net Efficiency7.3

2.7Strength of Schedule-1.5

-14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

69.9Tempo73.9

52.7%Effective FG%55.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.4%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%

-6.0Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–40.9), offensive efficiency (112.5–107.1), defensive efficiency (105.2–115.7), net efficiency (7.3–-8.6).

Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-1.5), offensive rebounding (27.0–26.7).

Final

Northeastern

70—68

William & Mary

Northeastern by 2 • 77.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NortheasternTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

25-58FG23-48

43.0%FG%48.0%

5-203PT6-19

25.0%3PT%32.0%

15-22FT16-24

68.0%FT%67.0%

32Rebounds33

11Offensive Rebounds6

12Assists12

18Turnovers25

16Steals12

4Blocks2

22Fouls20

Player Box Score

Northeastern

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashad King	G	38	6-11	0-1	10-10	5	6	3	1	22
Harold Woods	G	36	6-10	2-3	2-4	13	3	5	0	16
JB Frankel	G	34	4-11	1-6	3-4	2	0	0	0	12
Youri Fritz	F	25	4-7	0-0	0-1	5	1	1	2	8
LA Pratt	G	28	3-10	1-4	0-0	2	1	1	0	7
William Kermoury	G	14	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Luca Soroa Schaller	G	14	1-4	0-2	0-1	0	1	5	0	2
Collin Metcalf	C	11	0-1	0-0	0-2	2	0	1	1	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Caleb Dorsey	Forward	26	7-7	1-1	5-5	5	1	2	0	20
Matteus Case	Guard	24	3-7	0-1	5-9	4	2	2	0	11
Isaiah Mbeng	G	21	3-5	2-4	0-0	1	5	1	0	8
Chase Lowe	G	19	2-4	0-0	3-6	2	0	1	0	7
Finn Lally	F	11	3-6	0-1	1-2	3	0	1	1	7
Keller Boothby	Forward	29	2-7	2-6	0-0	4	0	1	0	6
Gabe Dorsey	Guard	35	2-6	1-4	0-0	5	2	3	1	5
Kyle Pulliam	G	15	1-3	0-1	2-2	0	1	0	0	4
Malachi Ndur	Forward	10	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Kyle Frazier	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.0Possessions77.0

90.9Offensive Efficiency88.3

88.3Defensive Efficiency90.9

2.6Net Efficiency-2.6

47.4%Effective FG%54.2%

51.1%True Shooting %57.2%

23.9%Turnover Rate31.9%

37.9%Free Throw Rate50.0%

34.5%3-Point Rate39.6%

0.67Assist / Turnover0.48

Game Summary

Northeastern won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 77.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.