Yale

23-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.4%Yale

28.6%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADYale -4.6

PROJECTED TOTAL141.6

MODEL MONEYLINEYale -250

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreYale 73

Projected Total141.6

Projected ScoreHarvard 69

Team Comparison

YaleMetricHarvard

65.4MMH Power Index52.6

121.4Offensive Efficiency108.1

105.8Defensive Efficiency102.9

15.6Net Efficiency5.2

1.6Strength of Schedule-0.1

8.9Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

64.5Tempo64.8

56.8%Effective FG%53.4%

13.9%Turnover Rate17.2%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

34.4%Free Throw Rate27.9%

10.1Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–52.6), offensive efficiency (121.4–108.1), net efficiency (15.6–5.2), strength of schedule (1.6–-0.1).

Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–105.8).

Final

Yale

69—74

Harvard

Harvard by 5 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

YaleTEAM STATHarvard

29-67FG27-58

43.0%FG%47.0%

4-163PT9-22

25.0%3PT%41.0%

7-11FT11-11

64.0%FT%100.0%

37Rebounds34

14Offensive Rebounds8

14Assists14

8Turnovers10

6Steals5

2Blocks5

11Fouls12

Player Box Score

Yale

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bez Mbeng	Guard	40	8-15	0-3	4-7	11	11	1	0	20
Nick Townsend	F	33	7-13	1-1	3-4	7	1	2	0	18
John Poulakidas	Guard	35	5-16	2-9	0-0	4	0	1	0	12
Casey Simmons	G	26	5-10	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	11
Isaac Celiscar	F	21	2-5	0-0	0-0	6	2	1	0	4
Samson Aletan	C	23	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	2
Trevor Mullin	G	15	1-4	0-2	0-0	3	0	1	1	2
Riley Fox	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Molloy	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chandler Pigge	G	36	5-10	1-3	2-2	7	4	1	0	13
Evan Nelson	G	26	5-9	1-2	1-1	2	2	2	0	12
Louis Lesmond	G	33	4-7	1-4	2-2	5	2	0	1	11
Austin Hunt	G	22	3-7	2-2	2-2	5	3	0	0	10
Tey Barbour	G	13	3-4	2-3	2-2	1	1	2	0	10
Thomas Batties III	F	32	4-11	1-6	0-0	7	0	0	4	9
Robert Hinton	G	30	2-9	0-1	2-2	5	1	0	0	6
Ben Eisendrath	G	8	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

105.0Offensive Efficiency112.6

112.6Defensive Efficiency105.0

-7.6Net Efficiency7.6

46.3%Effective FG%54.3%

47.8%True Shooting %58.5%

12.1%Turnover Rate15.3%

16.4%Free Throw Rate19.0%

23.9%3-Point Rate37.9%

1.75Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

Harvard won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.