New Orleans logo

New Orleans

16-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.6%New Orleans
81.4%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -11.2
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -438
UT Rio Grande Valley logo

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNew Orleans 70
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 81

Team Comparison

47.1MMH Power Index55.8
107.0Offensive Efficiency112.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency103.1
-2.6Net Efficiency9.5
0.2Strength of Schedule-1.9
0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
70.8Tempo67.4
50.5%Effective FG%55.7%
20.2%Turnover Rate17.9%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
48.4%Free Throw Rate29.6%
-1.8Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–47.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–107.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.6), net efficiency (9.5–-2.6).
New Orleans COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-1.9), offensive rebounding (35.7–29.2), free throw rate (48.4–29.6).
Final
New Orleans logo
New Orleans
78—88
UT Rio Grande Valley logo
UT Rio Grande Valley
UT Rio Grande Valley by 10 • 72.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New OrleansTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley
32-77FG30-66
42.0%FG%45.0%
6-213PT14-36
29.0%3PT%39.0%
8-11FT14-15
73.0%FT%93.0%
45Rebounds38
20Offensive Rebounds11
14Assists22
10Turnovers10
9Steals10
2Blocks3
12Fouls9

Player Box Score

New Orleans
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
JR JacobsGuard387-183-83-364400020
Theo GrantGuard357-162-52-343110018
MJ ThomasF376-160-02-282100014
Leland ColemanF335-71-10-041100011
Grant KempG304-110-50-111420008
Luke DavisF273-90-21-26001007
UT Rio Grande Valley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
DK ThornGuard379-144-83-444300025
Howie Fleming Jr.G335-113-76-6106110019
Cliff DavisG306-114-90-064100016
Trey MillerG383-112-62-204300010
Marshal DestremauF193-61-21-17211008
Kwo AgwaF163-60-10-03111006
Jaylen WashingtonG161-40-22-24100004
Mustafo VanjovC50-10-10-00000000
RJ NanceGuard30-10-00-00000000
Fadi MougharbelGuard30-10-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.2Possessions72.2
108.0Offensive Efficiency121.9
121.9Defensive Efficiency108.0
-13.9Net Efficiency13.9
45.5%Effective FG%56.1%
47.4%True Shooting %60.2%
13.8%Turnover Rate13.9%
14.3%Free Throw Rate22.7%
27.3%3-Point Rate54.5%
1.40Assist / Turnover2.20
Game Summary
UT Rio Grande Valley won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 72.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.