Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.9%Grambling

57.1%Florida A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL142.5

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -133

Florida A&M

14-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 71

Projected Total142.5

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 72

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricFlorida A&M

41.4MMH Power Index39.4

100.7Offensive Efficiency98.7

100.4Defensive Efficiency105.6

0.3Net Efficiency-6.9

-5.7Strength of Schedule-3.2

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5

69.9Tempo70.6

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

20.9%Turnover Rate21.6%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

42.2%Free Throw Rate38.0%

0.2Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–39.4), offensive efficiency (100.7–98.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–105.6), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.2–-5.7), recent form (4.5–-0.4), offensive rebounding (30.5–30.4).

Final

Grambling

68—73

Florida A&M

Florida A&M by 5 • 63.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATFlorida A&M

22-52FG19-40

42.0%FG%47.0%

6-153PT8-21

40.0%3PT%38.0%

18-24FT27-32

75.0%FT%84.0%

26Rebounds28

7Offensive Rebounds3

6Assists7

7Turnovers11

2Steals5

2Blocks1

24Fouls17

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	31	4-12	1-5	4-4	4	2	1	0	13
Ernest Ross	Forward	20	4-7	1-2	2-2	4	0	0	1	11
James Flippin	F	24	3-8	0-1	4-6	2	0	0	0	10
P.J. Edwards	G	31	3-8	1-3	2-4	5	4	0	0	9
Mikale Stevenson	G	28	3-7	1-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	9
Cbo Newton	G	27	2-2	1-1	3-4	3	0	0	1	8
Lou Hutchinson	G	24	2-5	1-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Emeka Nnaji	Forward	12	1-3	0-0	1-2	0	0	1	0	3
Emareyon McDonald	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Roderick Coffee III	F	36	6-8	2-2	5-6	4	2	2	0	19
Sterling Young	G	24	3-6	1-3	10-10	0	0	1	0	17
Milton Matthews III	G	38	4-10	3-7	3-3	9	0	1	0	14
Jordan Chatman	G	24	2-5	2-5	2-2	1	1	1	0	8
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	21	1-2	0-0	5-7	4	0	0	0	7
Kaleb Washington	F	33	3-8	0-4	0-0	5	4	0	0	6
Jamine Charles	Forward	18	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	1	1
Shaqir O'Neal	F	6	0-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

63.3Possessions63.3

107.4Offensive Efficiency115.3

115.3Defensive Efficiency107.4

-7.9Net Efficiency7.9

48.1%Effective FG%57.5%

53.6%True Shooting %66.1%

11.0%Turnover Rate17.4%

46.2%Free Throw Rate80.0%

28.8%3-Point Rate52.5%

0.86Assist / Turnover0.64

Game Summary

Florida A&M won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 63.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.