
Grand Canyon
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.5%Grand Canyon
39.5%Seattle U
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.9
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -153

Seattle U
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 72
Projected Total141.9
Projected ScoreSeattle U 70
Team Comparison
59.8MMH Power Index51.4
109.2Offensive Efficiency103.9
99.1Defensive Efficiency96.9
10.1Net Efficiency7.0
2.0Strength of Schedule-1.7
9.7Last 10 Net Efficiency4.1
69.3Tempo69.4
52.1%Effective FG%50.8%
17.6%Turnover Rate16.6%
31.2%Offensive Rebound %25.1%
41.0%Free Throw Rate35.2%
7.0Average Margin4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–51.4), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.9), net efficiency (10.1–7.0), strength of schedule (2.0–-1.7).
Seattle U COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (96.9–99.1), ball security (16.6–17.6).