Queens University

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.9%Queens University

52.1%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -2.8

PROJECTED TOTAL163.5

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -109

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 80

Projected Total163.5

Projected ScoreLipscomb 83

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricLipscomb

51.7MMH Power Index47.9

118.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

117.0Defensive Efficiency107.6

1.4Net Efficiency3.7

0.1Strength of Schedule-2.5

1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

71.4Tempo68.8

56.6%Effective FG%54.8%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

37.6%Free Throw Rate26.5%

0.9Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–47.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–111.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.5), recent form (1.5–-1.0).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–117.0), net efficiency (3.7–1.4), average scoring margin (2.5–0.9).

Final

Queens University

75—81

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 6 • 67.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATLipscomb

29-72FG23-47

40.0%FG%49.0%

8-243PT8-22

33.0%3PT%36.0%

9-12FT27-29

75.0%FT%93.0%

35Rebounds35

17Offensive Rebounds7

14Assists11

8Turnovers13

8Steals5

6Blocks6

24Fouls12

Player Box Score

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaxon Pollard	F	24	6-10	4-6	1-1	3	2	1	0	17
Leo Colimerio	Forward	33	6-15	0-2	1-1	7	3	1	1	13
Yoav Berman	G	27	5-12	3-7	0-0	2	1	0	1	13
Kalib Mathews	Guard	33	3-12	1-4	4-4	5	0	1	0	11
Chris Ashby	G	33	3-9	0-3	0-0	1	3	1	1	6
Nasir Mann	G	14	2-6	0-1	2-4	4	0	0	0	6
Malcolm Wilson	Forward	30	2-2	0-0	1-2	8	2	1	3	5
Bryce Cash	Guard	30	2-5	0-0	0-0	1	3	3	0	4
Maban Jabriel	F	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joe Anderson	Guard	45	7-13	4-8	7-9	1	4	5	1	25
Jacob Ognacevic	F	42	7-12	1-1	6-6	12	1	0	2	21
Charlie Williams	C	33	4-4	2-2	6-6	8	3	0	2	16
Will Pruitt	Guard	45	3-9	0-4	6-6	5	1	0	1	12
Gyasi Powell	Guard	35	2-7	1-6	0-0	4	1	0	0	5
Miles White	G	15	0-1	0-1	2-2	2	1	0	0	2
Grant Asman	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.8Possessions67.8

110.6Offensive Efficiency119.5

119.5Defensive Efficiency110.6

-8.8Net Efficiency8.8

45.8%Effective FG%57.4%

48.3%True Shooting %66.6%

11.6%Turnover Rate19.5%

16.7%Free Throw Rate61.7%

33.3%3-Point Rate46.8%

1.75Assist / Turnover0.85

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 67.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.